Abstract
Abstract
The alternative fulfillment mechanism for ecological and environmental damage liability represents a pivotal institutional innovation. Its principal function is to enable liable parties—under exceptional circumstances—to flexibly fulfill their ecological and environmental damage liability. This study adopts an empirical research method to systematically investigate the judicial application of the alternative performance mechanism. Findings reveal that under the guidance of the restorative justice concept, courts increasingly subsume diverse alternative performance modalities under the category of “alternative restoration”, leading to the gradual distortion of the alternative restoration centered on the concept of “equivalent restoration” into a “universal solution” for ecological damage cases. This practical tendency significantly weakens the actual effectiveness of ecological restoration. The purpose of this study is to establish a dual mechanism of alternative fulfillment—distinguishing between alternative restoration and alternative compensation—based on ecological principles and within the framework of the dual responsibilities of “restoration—compensation” for ecological environmental damage. The effectiveness of the dual mechanism is quantitatively evaluated using the AHP-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. The evaluation results show that, after distinguishing between the two types of alternative responsibilities, the comprehensive evaluation scores for ecological damage remedy in cases of ecological destruction, water pollution, and soil pollution increased from 5.155 to 8.935, from 6.406 to 9.116, and from 6.137 to 9.108, respectively, effectively correcting the functional deviation of the current single-dimensional remedy model. This study clarifies the independent application criteria of alternative restoration and alternative compensation, and provides targeted optimization paths for the judicial application of ecological damage remedy.
Direct answer
What can I do from this paper page?
Use this page to scan "The Dual Structure of Ecological Damage Liability Alternative Fulfillment in China: Based on AHP-Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method" quickly: start with the summary and abstract, then check the authors, source, topics, and related papers. From here, open Scollr to follow Environmental Conservation and Management research, save the paper, or map adjacent work.
Research areas
Follow related topics
Citation
BibTeX
@article{Li2026Dual,
title = {The Dual Structure of Ecological Damage Liability Alternative Fulfillment in China: Based on AHP-Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method},
author = {Weiwei Li and S H Yang and Manchang Wu},
journal = {Sustainability},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.3390/su18147039},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/su18147039}
}
FAQ
Using this paper in a discovery workflow
How do I find related work for this paper?
Use the related papers and topic links on this page as starting points. In Scollr, you can also open the paper and build a literature map around its references, citing papers, and related work.
How can I keep up with new Environmental Conservation and Management research papers?
Follow Environmental Conservation and Management research in Scollr. New papers from the topic flow into a personalized feed, and you can save useful studies to revisit later.
Can I cite this paper from this page?
This page includes a static BibTeX block for The Dual Structure of Ecological Damage Liability Alternative Fulfillment in China: Based on AHP-Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method. Always verify the DOI, source, and publication details against the publisher record before submitting a manuscript.
Follow this research in Scollr
Follow the topics and authors behind this paper, save useful studies, and build a literature map when you are ready to go deeper.
Get the app