Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Open access
Peer reviewed
Abstract
Abstract
Increasing attention on “ultra-processed” foods (UPFs) and their health effects has sparked policy debate. News media influences public perceptions yet understanding of UPF framing and industry influence remains limited. This study analysed UPF framing in UK news media and trade press, exploring interests of quoted individuals and organisations. We systematically searched UK media for UPF articles in 2022–23, identifying 188 articles for mixed-methods content analysis. Articles were examined for their position towards classifying food by processing-level (accepted/contested/mixed). Framing Theory guided identification of UPF frames describing problem definitions, causes, and solutions. Actors’ interests were classified using academic journal guidelines. Half the articles (52%) accepted the UPF concept, 19% contested it, and 29% were mixed. Five frames were identified. The ‘Social Justice’, ‘Lifestyle Drift’, and ‘Science Report’ frames accepted the UPF concept, with the ‘Social Justice’ frame positioning UPF consumption as a structural public health problem requiring policy action such as taxes or front-of-package labelling. The ‘UPF Critique’ and ‘Market Justice’ frames contested the scientific basis of the UPF concept, proposing nutrient-based approaches instead. Among 116 named actors, 33% had UPF industry interests, with academics comprising 45% and industry spokespeople 11%. Actors with UPF industry interests were more commonly cited in contesting frames (e.g. ‘Market Justice’: 73%) than accepting frames (e.g. ‘Social Justice’: 10%). These findings highlight that industry influence on UPF media discourse is often obscured behind academic voices. Greater transparency around actor interests is urgently needed to ensure emerging UPF policies are shaped by independent evidence.
Direct answer
What can I do from this paper page?
Use this page to scan "Framing of ultra-processed foods in UK news media (2022–2023) and associations with quoted actors’ interests: a mixed-methods study" quickly: start with the summary and abstract, then check the authors, source, topics, and related papers. From here, open Scollr to follow Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling research, save the paper, or map adjacent work.
Research areas
Follow related topics
Citation
BibTeX
@article{Parnham2026Framing,
title = {Framing of ultra-processed foods in UK news media (2022–2023) and associations with quoted actors’ interests: a mixed-methods study},
author = {Jennie C Parnham and Kiara Chang and Michael Essman and Deb Smith and Mike P Etkind and Maisie McKenzie and Prisha Shah and Milica Vasiljevic and M Petticrew and Martin White and Anthony A Laverty and E. Boyland and Steven Cummins and Christopher Millett and Jean Adams and Eszter P. Vamos},
journal = {Food Policy},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.1016/j.foodpol.2026.103160},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2026.103160}
}FAQ
Using this paper in a discovery workflow
How do I find related work for this paper?
Use the related papers and topic links on this page as starting points. In Scollr, you can also open the paper and build a literature map around its references, citing papers, and related work.
How can I keep up with new Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling research papers?
Follow Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling research in Scollr. New papers from the topic flow into a personalized feed, and you can save useful studies to revisit later.
Can I cite this paper from this page?
This page includes a static BibTeX block for Framing of ultra-processed foods in UK news media (2022–2023) and associations with quoted actors’ interests: a mixed-methods study. Always verify the DOI, source, and publication details against the publisher record before submitting a manuscript.
Follow this research in Scollr
Follow the topics and authors behind this paper, save useful studies, and build a literature map when you are ready to go deeper.
Get the app