Inside the Dollhouse: Litigation, Corporate Power, and Competition in the American Mid-Twentieth Century Toy Industry

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract We use Mattel’s rise in the 1950s and 1960s, particularly Barbie’s 1959 launch, to examine how intellectual property became a competitive tool in postwar American capitalism. Why did firms in fast-moving, design-driven industries supplement product innovation, distribution, and advertising with IP enforcement and aggressive litigation? Building on legal recognition of copyright and trademark, we argue that Mattel’s early-1960s litigation targeted a specific business model and competitive environment. Barbie was conceived as a scalable product supported by outfits, accessories, companion dolls, heavy investment in brand differentiation, and Ruth Handler’s narrative of originality. Yet Barbie entered a fashion-doll market shaped by earlier pioneers. Manufacturing’s shift to East Asia intensified competition by lowering imitation costs and making copying difficult to counter through innovation alone. Drawing on archival papers, court records, oral histories, and collectors’ materials, we show how IP enforcement moved beyond protecting creativity to structuring markets in a low-tech, seasonal, copy-prone industry.