Abstract
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to provide a systematic analysis of the concept of the “local auxiliary police” in the Reichskommissariat “Ukraine” (hereinafter – RKU) within contemporary historiographical discourse, to identify its main structural characteristics, and to provide a theoretical justification for its use as a generalized historiographical category in the study of the Nazi occupation regime of 1941–1944. The methodological framework is based on general scientific and specialized historical methods, including the comparative-historical, structural-functional, and terminological methods. The comparative-historical method was employed to compare different scholarly approaches to defining local police formations. The structural-functional method was used to identify the organizational, personnel, and functional characteristics of the local auxiliary police. The relationship between historical concepts and their historiographical interpretations was examined through terminological analysis. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the theoretical analysis of the organizational, legal, personnel, and functional characteristics of local police formations in the RKU. The main outcome of the study is the formulation of a generalized historiographical category of “local auxiliary police” that may serve as an effective analytical tool for studying the Nazi occupation regime. The conclusions demonstrate that, despite differences in the authorities responsible for their establishment, official designations, and organizational structures, local police formations shared common principles of recruitment, subordination, and formally defined functions. The attributes “local” and “auxiliary” characterize the territorial principle of recruitment and the institutional dependence of these formations on the German occupation authorities.
Direct answer
What can I do from this paper page?
Use this page to scan "THE CONCEPT OF “LOCAL AUXILIARY POLICE” IN THE REICHSKOMMISSARIAT “UKRAINE” IN CONTEMPORARY HISTORIOGRAPHICAL DISCOURSE: TERMINOLOGICAL PROBLEMS AND THEORETICAL JUSTIFICATION" quickly: start with the summary and abstract, then check the authors, source, topics, and related papers. From here, open Scollr to follow European history and politics research, save the paper, or map adjacent work.
Research areas
Follow related topics
Citation
BibTeX
@article{2026CONCEPT,
title = {THE CONCEPT OF “LOCAL AUXILIARY POLICE” IN THE REICHSKOMMISSARIAT “UKRAINE” IN CONTEMPORARY HISTORIOGRAPHICAL DISCOURSE: TERMINOLOGICAL PROBLEMS AND THEORETICAL JUSTIFICATION},
author = {Олександр Григорович Шамрай},
journal = {South Archive (Historical Sciences)},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.32999/ksu2786-5118/2026-55-8},
url = {https://doi.org/10.32999/ksu2786-5118/2026-55-8}
}
FAQ
Using this paper in a discovery workflow
How do I find related work for this paper?
Use the related papers and topic links on this page as starting points. In Scollr, you can also open the paper and build a literature map around its references, citing papers, and related work.
How can I keep up with new European history and politics research papers?
Follow European history and politics research in Scollr. New papers from the topic flow into a personalized feed, and you can save useful studies to revisit later.
Can I cite this paper from this page?
This page includes a static BibTeX block for THE CONCEPT OF “LOCAL AUXILIARY POLICE” IN THE REICHSKOMMISSARIAT “UKRAINE” IN CONTEMPORARY HISTORIOGRAPHICAL DISCOURSE: TERMINOLOGICAL PROBLEMS AND THEORETICAL JUSTIFICATION. Always verify the DOI, source, and publication details against the publisher record before submitting a manuscript.
Follow this research in Scollr
Follow the topics and authors behind this paper, save useful studies, and build a literature map when you are ready to go deeper.
Get the app