Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances Open access Peer reviewed

Concordance Between Bedside and Electronic Detection of Intracranial Pressure Crises: Insights From the Brain Tissue Oxygen Monitoring and Management in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury II Trial

Randall M. Chesnut, Nancy Temkin, Jason Barber, Christine Park and 2 more

Critical Care Medicine | Jun 16, 2026

Scollr summary

What this paper is about

Current methods of clinical identification of B-ICP episodes may not reliably distinguish true episodes of sustained ICP for the most common B-ICP episode type, and is suggested to develop open-source, real-time, temporally synchronized electronic B-ICP episode definition methods.

Full abstract

Read the full abstract

OBJECTIVE: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) research and intracranial pressure (ICP) management depends on bedside ICP (B-ICP) crisis identification. We analyzed background-collected electronic ICP (E-ICP) data to study the concordance of this identification. DESIGN: Post hoc comparison of background-collected continuous E-ICP data to routine B-ICP information during severe TBI management in the Brain Tissue Oxygen Monitoring and Management in Severe TBI (BOOST II) randomized trial. SETTING: Ten U.S. ICUs. PATIENTS: Seventy of 110 randomized BOOST II severe TBI patients with complete datasets for this study. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We studied "minimalist" B-ICP episodes lasting less than or equal to 60 minutes and requiring only tier 1 treatments (83% of total BOOST II I isolated ICP episodes). Bedside clinicians (BCs) identified and treated 509 minimalist B-ICP episodes, defined by 5 minutes of B-ICP greater than or equal to 20 mm Hg (B-ICP 5 ). Corresponding E-ICP during this defining period (E-ICP 5 ) confirmed only 47% of these. The 241 "concordant" B-ICP episodes (both B-ICP 5 and E-ICP 5 ≥ 20 mm Hg) had average E-ICP values for the entire B-ICP episodes (E-ICP AVG ) less than 20 mm Hg in 38%. The 286 "discordant" B-ICP episodes (B-ICP 5 ≥ 20 mm Hg but E-ICP 5 < 20 mm Hg) had E-ICP AVG values less than 20 mm Hg in 76% and both E-ICP AVG and maximal E-ICP's (E-ICP MAX ) values less than 20 mm Hg in 31%. Testing for confounding (e.g., brief, first, or easily controlled B-ICP episodes) did not provide explanations. Insufficient data were available to evaluate temporal asynchrony between BC and electronic datapoints. Study limitations were lacking a rigid end-of-B-ICP episode definition and inability to fully control for temporal synchrony confounding. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that current methods of clinical identification of B-ICP episodes may not reliably distinguish true episodes of sustained ICP for the most common B-ICP episode type. We suggest developing open-source, real-time, temporally synchronized electronic B-ICP episode definition methods to direct future treatment and research.

Direct answer

What can I do from this paper page?

Use this page to scan "Concordance Between Bedside and Electronic Detection of Intracranial Pressure Crises: Insights From the Brain Tissue Oxygen Monitoring and Management in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury II Trial" quickly: start with the summary and abstract, then check the authors, source, topics, and related papers. From here, open Scollr to follow Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances research, save the paper, or map adjacent work.

Authors

Researchers on this paper

Randall M. Chesnut

first | University of Washington | ORCID 0000-0001-6377-3666

Nancy Temkin

middle | University of Washington

Jason Barber

middle | University of Washington

Christine Park

middle | University of Washington

Robert H. Bonow

middle | University of Washington

On behalf of the Brain Tissue Oxygen Monitoring and Management in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury II (BOOST II) Investigators

last

Research areas

Follow related topics

Citation

BibTeX

@article{Chesnut2026Concordance,
  title = {Concordance Between Bedside and Electronic Detection of Intracranial Pressure Crises: Insights From the Brain Tissue Oxygen Monitoring and Management in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury II Trial},
  author = {Randall M. Chesnut and Nancy Temkin and Jason Barber and Christine Park and Robert H. Bonow and On behalf of the Brain Tissue Oxygen Monitoring and Management in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury II (BOOST II) Investigators},
  journal = {Critical Care Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  doi = {10.1097/ccm.0000000000007223},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000007223}
}

FAQ

Using this paper in a discovery workflow

How do I find related work for this paper?

Use the related papers and topic links on this page as starting points. In Scollr, you can also open the paper and build a literature map around its references, citing papers, and related work.

How can I keep up with new Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances research papers?

Follow Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances research in Scollr. New papers from the topic flow into a personalized feed, and you can save useful studies to revisit later.

Can I cite this paper from this page?

This page includes a static BibTeX block for Concordance Between Bedside and Electronic Detection of Intracranial Pressure Crises: Insights From the Brain Tissue Oxygen Monitoring and Management in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury II Trial. Always verify the DOI, source, and publication details against the publisher record before submitting a manuscript.

Follow this research in Scollr

Follow the topics and authors behind this paper, save useful studies, and build a literature map when you are ready to go deeper.

Get the app