Scollr summary
What this paper is about
Weight misperception was selectively associated with restrictive feeding, identifying it as a candidate cognitive target in early obesity prevention research.
Full abstract
Read the full abstract
Background/Objectives: Caregiver perception of child weight may be a cognitive antecedent of feeding practices, yet evidence linking misperception to feeding practices remains inconsistent. Guided by Social Cognitive Theory, this study examined whether caregiver weight perception (underestimation, overestimation, or accurate) is independently associated with feeding practices among caregivers of U.S. preschool-aged children. Methods: Primary caregivers of children aged 3–5 years (analytic n = 139) were recruited across the Midwestern United States from April 2022 to March 2023. Weight perception was classified as accurate, underestimation, or overestimation by comparing perceived with CDC BMI-for-age category. Four Comprehensive Feeding Practices Questionnaire (CFPQ) subscales were assessed: pressure to eat, restriction for health, restriction for weight control, and monitoring. Multivariable linear regression estimated associations, adjusting for child and caregiver characteristics and child BMI-for-age z-score. Results: Overall, 45.3% of caregivers accurately perceived their child’s weight, 44.6% underestimated it, and 10.1% overestimated it. In adjusted models, underestimation was independently associated with lower restriction for health (B = −0.62, 95% CI: −1.10, −0.13, p = 0.013) and lower restriction for weight control (B = −0.30, 95% CI: −0.58, −0.02, p = 0.033) relative to accurate perception. Overestimation was marginally associated with higher restriction for weight control (B = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.00, 1.07, p = 0.050). No associations were observed with pressure to eat or monitoring. Conclusions: Weight misperception was selectively associated with restrictive feeding. This identifies it as a candidate cognitive target in early obesity prevention research. Longitudinal research is needed to establish causality.
Direct answer
What can I do from this paper page?
Use this page to scan "Caregiver Weight Misperception and Feeding Practices in U.S. Preschool-Aged Children: A Theory-Based Cross-Sectional Study" quickly: start with the summary and abstract, then check the authors, source, topics, and related papers. From here, open Scollr to follow Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet research, save the paper, or map adjacent work.
Research areas
Follow related topics
Citation
BibTeX
@article{Oudat2026Caregiver,
title = {Caregiver Weight Misperception and Feeding Practices in U.S. Preschool-Aged Children: A Theory-Based Cross-Sectional Study},
author = {Qutaibah Oudat and Sarah Messiah and Tamilyn Bakas and Alia Ghoneum},
journal = {Nutrients},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.3390/nu18121880},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18121880}
}
FAQ
Using this paper in a discovery workflow
How do I find related work for this paper?
Use the related papers and topic links on this page as starting points. In Scollr, you can also open the paper and build a literature map around its references, citing papers, and related work.
How can I keep up with new Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet research papers?
Follow Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet research in Scollr. New papers from the topic flow into a personalized feed, and you can save useful studies to revisit later.
Can I cite this paper from this page?
This page includes a static BibTeX block for Caregiver Weight Misperception and Feeding Practices in U.S. Preschool-Aged Children: A Theory-Based Cross-Sectional Study. Always verify the DOI, source, and publication details against the publisher record before submitting a manuscript.
Follow this research in Scollr
Follow the topics and authors behind this paper, save useful studies, and build a literature map when you are ready to go deeper.
Get the app