Antifungal resistance and susceptibility Open access Peer reviewed

Interpreting combined BALF-galactomannan and next-generation sequencing in pulmonary aspergillosis and mucormycosis: a two-center clinical decision framework

L Yang, Xiaoqi Zhang, Nan Su, Lijuan Li

Frontiers in Microbiology | Jul 22, 2026

Abstract

Abstract

Objectives To identify which patients with pulmonary aspergillosis or mucormycosis (PAM) derive the greatest incremental diagnostic benefit from next-generation sequencing (NGS) beyond conventional microbiology, and to derive a GM × NGS interpretive framework that identifies the patient subgroup in which NGS adds the most information, based on routinely available bedside variables. Secondary objectives were to characterize the pathogen spectrum detected by NGS, quantify pairwise concordance with BALF galactomannan and culture, and assess the relationship between quantitative Aspergillus reads and BALF-GM intensity. Methods Two-center retrospective case-cohort study of 595 adults with NGS-tested pulmonary aspergillosis or mucormycosis (PAM; proven, probable, or possible per EORTC/MSGERC and ECMM-MSGERC criteria). Primary method-comparison analysis was restricted to the strict subset with NGS, BALF-galactomannan (GM), and culture all available ( n = 434). Total Aspergillus reads were defined as the per-case sum of species-level Aspergillus reads parsed from free-text NGS reports, with Mucorales reads excluded. Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of GM-negative status among NGS-positive cases ( n = 353; complete-case n = 342). The prospective component was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2500099900). Results In the strict 434-case subset, NGS fungal-signal positivity was 81.3%, BALF-GM (≥0.8) 58.1%, and culture 43.1%; pairwise overlap was substantial but incomplete. The GM-negative/NGS-positive subgroup ( n = 150) showed a milder phenotype than GM-positive/NGS-positive cases (severe pneumonia 28.7% (43/150) vs. 52.7% (107/203); mortality 6.7% (10/150) vs. 19.7% (40/203); both p < 0.001). Severe pneumonia was independently inversely associated with GM-negative status (adjusted OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.26–0.75, p = 0.002), while immunocompromise was independently positively associated (adjusted OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.17–3.47, p = 0.012). NGS Aspergillus positivity was essentially flat across BALF-GM intensity bands (79–82%); read counts correlated only weakly with BALF-GM titer [Spearman ρ = 0.185 (mNGS-only, n = 246)]. Conclusion When BALF-GM and NGS are co-ordered on the same lavage in routine PAM workup, the four GM × NGS quadrants define distinct clinical phenotypes with concrete management implications: NGS positivity in GM-negative cases (34.6%) carries the highest incremental yield and a milder phenotype; conversely, a negative NGS in GM-positive cases must not be used to rule out severe PAM. Across quadrants, NGS adds species- and co-pathogen-level information that changes therapy.

Direct answer

What can I do from this paper page?

Use this page to scan "Interpreting combined BALF-galactomannan and next-generation sequencing in pulmonary aspergillosis and mucormycosis: a two-center clinical decision framework" quickly: start with the summary and abstract, then check the authors, source, topics, and related papers. From here, open Scollr to follow Antifungal resistance and susceptibility research, save the paper, or map adjacent work.

Authors

Researchers on this paper

L Yang

first | Harbin Medical University

Xiaoqi Zhang

middle | Weifang People's Hospital

Nan Su

middle | China-Japan Friendship Hospital

Lijuan Li

last | China-Japan Friendship Hospital | ORCID 0000-0001-5984-1603

Research areas

Follow related topics

Citation

BibTeX

@article{Yang2026Interpreting,
  title = {Interpreting combined BALF-galactomannan and next-generation sequencing in pulmonary aspergillosis and mucormycosis: a two-center clinical decision framework},
  author = {L Yang and Xiaoqi Zhang and Nan Su and Lijuan Li},
  journal = {Frontiers in Microbiology},
  year = {2026},
  doi = {10.3389/fmicb.2026.1873197},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2026.1873197}
}

FAQ

Using this paper in a discovery workflow

How do I find related work for this paper?

Use the related papers and topic links on this page as starting points. In Scollr, you can also open the paper and build a literature map around its references, citing papers, and related work.

How can I keep up with new Antifungal resistance and susceptibility research papers?

Follow Antifungal resistance and susceptibility research in Scollr. New papers from the topic flow into a personalized feed, and you can save useful studies to revisit later.

Can I cite this paper from this page?

This page includes a static BibTeX block for Interpreting combined BALF-galactomannan and next-generation sequencing in pulmonary aspergillosis and mucormycosis: a two-center clinical decision framework. Always verify the DOI, source, and publication details against the publisher record before submitting a manuscript.

Follow this research in Scollr

Follow the topics and authors behind this paper, save useful studies, and build a literature map when you are ready to go deeper.

Get the app