Abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT The rapid growth of packaging waste has recently intensified the search for sustainable alternatives. Edible packaging, developed from biodegradable materials safe for consumption, represents a promising innovation that combines environmental responsibility with food preservation. Despite the interest of scientific research in the functional properties of edible packaging, limited attention has been given to its potential adoption within sustainable business strategies and to consumers' reactions to this sustainable solution. To address these issues, two studies were conducted to (a) compare consumer perceptions towards different types of edible coatings (ready‐to‐eat versus cook‐before‐eating); (b) investigate the role of food neophobia in influencing consumer acceptance of edible packaging; (c) examine how communication strategies, contrasting individual and collective benefit framings, influence evaluations of edible packaging. Findings from Study 1 showed that coatings designed to dissolve during cooking were evaluated more positively than ready‐to‐eat versions and elicited stronger positive emotions. Moreover, consumers with high food neophobia reported greater perceived risks and lower willingness to consume edible packaging. Study 2 revealed that framing effectiveness depends on packaging type: Individual‐benefit claims enhanced healthiness and taste perceptions for ready‐to‐eat packaging, whereas collective‐benefit claims improved evaluations of cook‐before‐eating packaging, particularly in terms of emotional engagement. Together, these studies highlight the crucial role of consumption context, individual traits and message framing in shaping consumer acceptance of edible packaging. This advances theoretical understanding of sustainable consumption behaviour and provides guidance on how businesses can design, communicate and implement edible packaging solutions to enhance consumer acceptance and create long‐term competitive advantage.
Direct answer
What can I do from this paper page?
Use this page to scan "‘Too Close to Eat?’ Exploring Consumer Responses to Edible Packaging Through the Lens of Food Neophobia and Construal Level Theory" quickly: start with the summary and abstract, then check the authors, source, topics, and related papers. From here, open Scollr to follow Consumer Packaging Perceptions and Trends research, save the paper, or map adjacent work.
Research areas
Follow related topics
Citation
BibTeX
@article{Vergura2026Close,
title = {‘Too Close to Eat?’ Exploring Consumer Responses to Edible Packaging Through the Lens of Food Neophobia and Construal Level Theory},
author = {Donata Tania Vergura and Cristina Zerbini and Settimio Ziccarelli},
journal = {Business Strategy and the Environment},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.1002/bse.71082},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.71082}
}
FAQ
Using this paper in a discovery workflow
How do I find related work for this paper?
Use the related papers and topic links on this page as starting points. In Scollr, you can also open the paper and build a literature map around its references, citing papers, and related work.
How can I keep up with new Consumer Packaging Perceptions and Trends research papers?
Follow Consumer Packaging Perceptions and Trends research in Scollr. New papers from the topic flow into a personalized feed, and you can save useful studies to revisit later.
Can I cite this paper from this page?
This page includes a static BibTeX block for ‘Too Close to Eat?’ Exploring Consumer Responses to Edible Packaging Through the Lens of Food Neophobia and Construal Level Theory. Always verify the DOI, source, and publication details against the publisher record before submitting a manuscript.
Follow this research in Scollr
Follow the topics and authors behind this paper, save useful studies, and build a literature map when you are ready to go deeper.
Get the app