Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension Open access Peer reviewed

When “right” goes wrong: poor accuracy of calculated right adrenal vein aldosterone levels in subtyping primary aldosteronism

Saachi Datta, Robin Wang, Vivek Bhalla, Jehan Z. Bahrainwala and 4 more

CVIR Endovascular | Sep 4, 2026

Scollr summary

What this paper is about

The AldosteroneLAV:cAldosteroneRAV ratio can help to rule in right-sided disease with high specificity, but otherwise has poor overall accuracy in disease subtyping, underscoring the importance of meticulous technique to achieve diagnostic samples during adrenal vein sampling.

Full abstract

Read the full abstract

Abstract Background The purpose of this study is to externally validate a published ratio of left adrenal aldosterone to calculated-right adrenal aldosterone (Aldosterone LAV :cAldosterone RAV ) proposed to determine disease subtype when right-sided adrenal vein sampling is unsuccessful. Materials and methods This single-center retrospective study included 199 post-adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation adrenal vein sampling cases (2016–2025). A selectivity index ≥ 5 was considered diagnostic and lateralization index ≥ 4 indicated unilateral disease. The cAldosterone RAV was calculated as cAldosterone RAV = [2 × Aldosterone IVC × (Cortisol LAV /Cortisol IVC )]–Aldosterone LAV . The ratio of Aldosterone LAV :cAldosterone RAV determined disease subtype; published thresholds were ≥ 3 for left-sided and ≤ 0.33 for right-sided disease. Intermediate values were deemed bilateral disease. Sensitivities and specificities of this metric were calculated using standard AVS interpretation as the gold standard reference. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis performed on the Aldosterone LAV :cAldosterone RAV ratio derived institution-optimized thresholds by maximizing the Youden’s J statistic. Results Adrenal vein sampling was technically successful with determinate lateralization indices in 164 patients (41 left, 35 right, 88 bilateral). Using the published thresholds of 3 and 0.33, the Aldosterone LAV :cAldosterone RAV ratio had an overall accuracy of 43.3% (95% CI 35.9–50.9%). Institution-optimized thresholds of ≥ 32.43 (left-sided) and ≤ 0.56 (right-sided) improved the accuracy to 65.9% (95% CI 58.3–72.7%). Using institution-optimized thresholds, the sensitivities/specificities for the calculated right-sided, left-sided, and bilateral disease were 88.6%/95.3%, 92.7%/63.4%, and 44.3%/93.4%, respectively. Conclusions The Aldosterone LAV :cAldosterone RAV ratio can help to rule in right-sided disease with high specificity, but otherwise has poor overall accuracy in disease subtyping, underscoring the importance of meticulous technique to achieve diagnostic samples during adrenal vein sampling.

Direct answer

What can I do from this paper page?

Use this page to scan "When “right” goes wrong: poor accuracy of calculated right adrenal vein aldosterone levels in subtyping primary aldosteronism" quickly: start with the summary and abstract, then check the authors, source, topics, and related papers. From here, open Scollr to follow Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension research, save the paper, or map adjacent work.

Authors

Researchers on this paper

Saachi Datta

first | Palo Alto University

Robin Wang

middle | Palo Alto University

Vivek Bhalla

middle | Palo Alto University | ORCID 0000-0002-5420-9657

Jehan Z. Bahrainwala

middle | Palo Alto University

Susan Seav

middle | Palo Alto University

Andrew C. Picel

middle | Palo Alto University | ORCID 0000-0001-6265-8885

David Wang

middle | Palo Alto University

Matthew Hung

last | Stanford Medicine | ORCID 0000-0001-8018-8514

Research areas

Follow related topics

Citation

BibTeX

@article{Datta2026When,
  title = {When “right” goes wrong: poor accuracy of calculated right adrenal vein aldosterone levels in subtyping primary aldosteronism},
  author = {Saachi Datta and Robin Wang and Vivek Bhalla and Jehan Z. Bahrainwala and Susan Seav and Andrew C. Picel and David Wang and Matthew Hung},
  journal = {CVIR Endovascular},
  year = {2026},
  doi = {10.1186/s42155-026-00769-6},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s42155-026-00769-6}
}

FAQ

Using this paper in a discovery workflow

How do I find related work for this paper?

Use the related papers and topic links on this page as starting points. In Scollr, you can also open the paper and build a literature map around its references, citing papers, and related work.

How can I keep up with new Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension research papers?

Follow Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension research in Scollr. New papers from the topic flow into a personalized feed, and you can save useful studies to revisit later.

Can I cite this paper from this page?

This page includes a static BibTeX block for When “right” goes wrong: poor accuracy of calculated right adrenal vein aldosterone levels in subtyping primary aldosteronism. Always verify the DOI, source, and publication details against the publisher record before submitting a manuscript.

Follow this research in Scollr

Follow the topics and authors behind this paper, save useful studies, and build a literature map when you are ready to go deeper.

Get the app