Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Open access
Peer reviewed
Abstract
Abstract
Abstract This paper aims to show that a neo-Aristotelian version of capacity-first philosophy of mind is fruitfully applied to a question which is specific to philosophy of psychology, namely: What counts as an adequate explanation in psychology? Drawing on Kenny, Glock and Schellenberg, the paper argues that the neo-Aristotelian capacity view is built around a set of criteria for the classification of capacities. All capacities are classified according to (1) possession-, (2) exercise-, (3) vehicle-, (4) opportunity-, (5) enablement- and (6) successful employment- criteria. These classification criteria are used to reconstruct the process of de-intellectualizing explanations of psychological phenomena. De-intellectualization targets theoretical assumptions about the circumstances in which the various criteria for classifying capacities are satisfied. The capacity approach offers a tool for regimenting the process of de-intellectualization. It also illustrates the contrast between de-intellectualization and Dennett’s homuncular functionalism. Rather than offering nothing more than conceptual clarity for debates about the metaphysics and epistemology of mind, the neo-Aristotelian capacity view explains why de-intellectualizing explanations is a feature of adequate explanations in psychology.
Direct answer
What can I do from this paper page?
Use this page to scan "Capacity-First Philosophy of Psychology" quickly: start with the summary and abstract, then check the authors, source, topics, and related papers. From here, open Scollr to follow Philosophy and Theoretical Science research, save the paper, or map adjacent work.
Research areas
Follow related topics
Citation
BibTeX
@article{Alexander2026Capacity,
title = {Capacity-First Philosophy of Psychology},
author = {Cameron Alexander},
journal = {Topoi},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.1007/s11245-026-10497-0},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-026-10497-0}
}FAQ
Using this paper in a discovery workflow
How do I find related work for this paper?
Use the related papers and topic links on this page as starting points. In Scollr, you can also open the paper and build a literature map around its references, citing papers, and related work.
How can I keep up with new Philosophy and Theoretical Science research papers?
Follow Philosophy and Theoretical Science research in Scollr. New papers from the topic flow into a personalized feed, and you can save useful studies to revisit later.
Can I cite this paper from this page?
This page includes a static BibTeX block for Capacity-First Philosophy of Psychology. Always verify the DOI, source, and publication details against the publisher record before submitting a manuscript.
Follow this research in Scollr
Follow the topics and authors behind this paper, save useful studies, and build a literature map when you are ready to go deeper.
Get the app