Abstract
Abstract
This article examines how images of financial clients are constructed in two contrasting organizational settings: the Israeli commercial bank Bank Hapoalim and the Russian financial pyramid MMM. Its aim is to compare the institutional representation of a responsible bank client with interpretations of the risk-taking participant in a financial pyramid. The study takes the form of a qualitative sociological etude based on comparative documentary analysis and the interpretation of cultural representations. The materials comprise corporate environmental, social, and governance reporting, published sociological research, retrospective survey evidence, regulatory guidance, press accounts, and the film PyraMMMid. These sources are distinguished by their evidential role: corporate reports express institutional self-presentation, published observations concern participant behavior, and the film provides an artistic representation rather than direct historical evidence. The analysis suggests that Bank Hapoalim presents an ideal client through the language of trust, social responsibility, and sustainable development. In the MMM case, the literature complicates an exclusively naive-victim interpretation by identifying participants whose awareness of risk coexisted with speculative expectations and collective pressures. The comparison is interpreted through constructivist and objectivist perspectives, understood as analytical emphases rather than mutually exclusive properties of the organizations. The main conclusion is that client portraits depend on institutional narratives, social conditions, and the researcher's choice of evidence. Because the cases differ in historical context and source composition, the findings are exploratory and do not establish representative psychological profiles of either client population. The study highlights the importance of separating institutional ideals from observed behavior when assessing trust and responsibility in financial relationships.
Direct answer
What can I do from this paper page?
Use this page to scan "The Antagonism of the “Bank Customer” Constructs: A Sociological Etude" quickly: start with the summary and abstract, then check the authors, source, topics, and related papers. From here, open Scollr to follow Management and Organizational Studies research, save the paper, or map adjacent work.
Research areas
Follow related topics
Citation
BibTeX
@article{Ibragimov2026Antagonism,
title = {The Antagonism of the “Bank Customer” Constructs: A Sociological Etude},
author = {Radiy Ibragimov and Svetlana Trusova and Isai Abramov},
journal = {Social Sciences},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.11648/j.ss.20261505.14},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20261505.14}
}
FAQ
Using this paper in a discovery workflow
How do I find related work for this paper?
Use the related papers and topic links on this page as starting points. In Scollr, you can also open the paper and build a literature map around its references, citing papers, and related work.
How can I keep up with new Management and Organizational Studies research papers?
Follow Management and Organizational Studies research in Scollr. New papers from the topic flow into a personalized feed, and you can save useful studies to revisit later.
Can I cite this paper from this page?
This page includes a static BibTeX block for The Antagonism of the “Bank Customer” Constructs: A Sociological Etude. Always verify the DOI, source, and publication details against the publisher record before submitting a manuscript.
Follow this research in Scollr
Follow the topics and authors behind this paper, save useful studies, and build a literature map when you are ready to go deeper.
Get the app