Scollr summary
What this paper is about
Overall, targeted syndromic testing and mNGS demonstrated complementary diagnostic performance, with mNGS extending organism and resistance-mechanism coverage beyond predefined molecular targets, while phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing remained necessary for definitive susceptibility assessment.
Full abstract
Read the full abstract
ABSTRACT Rapid syndromic molecular panels substantially reduce turnaround time for bloodstream infection diagnosis by identifying common pathogens and selected antimicrobial resistance determinants directly from positive blood cultures. However, their fixed target repertoires may limit diagnostic coverage in settings with diverse endemic resistance mechanisms and clinically relevant off-panel organisms. This retrospective comparative diagnostic study evaluated direct-from-positive-blood-culture metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS), the BioFire Blood Culture Identification 2 (BCID2) panel, and routine microbiological methods across 165 positive blood-culture episodes from 145 patients at a tertiary-care center with a high burden of antimicrobial resistance. Complete recovery of the routine-culture organism set was achieved in 155/165 episodes (93.9%) by mNGS and 142/165 (86.1%) by BCID2. Among 23 episodes with incomplete routine-set recovery by BCID2, mNGS restored complete coverage in 18 (78.3%). For meropenem resistance, sensitivity was numerically higher with mNGS than with BCID2 (90.0% versus 75.0%), whereas ceftriaxone-resistance sensitivity among Enterobacterales was numerically higher with BCID2 (97.5% versus 85.0%); neither paired difference was statistically significant. BCID2 meropenem very major errors were concentrated among non-fermenting gram-negative organisms, particularly Acinetobacter baumannii , and were frequently associated with off-panel bla OXA-23 detected by mNGS. Overall, targeted syndromic testing and mNGS demonstrated complementary diagnostic performance, with mNGS extending organism and resistance-mechanism coverage beyond predefined molecular targets, while phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing remained necessary for definitive susceptibility assessment. IMPORTANCE Rapid molecular blood-culture panels provide clinically actionable results, but are inherently restricted to predefined pathogen and resistance targets. This limitation is particularly relevant in regions where local antimicrobial resistance epidemiology includes mechanisms not represented within commercial panel repertoires. In this study, metagenomic sequencing improved recovery of routine-culture organisms and identified off-panel carbapenem resistance determinants underlying several false-susceptible panel results, particularly OXA-23 in Acinetobacter baumannii . However, broader genomic detection did not consistently improve phenotypic resistance prediction across antimicrobial classes. These findings illustrate that diagnostic breadth and phenotypic predictive accuracy are distinct attributes and support the use of metagenomic sequencing as a complementary approach to rapid targeted testing and conventional antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
Direct answer
What can I do from this paper page?
Use this page to scan "Off-panel resistance determinants in a high-resistance setting: comparative evaluation of syndromic multiplex PCR, metagenomic sequencing, and phenotypic AST in bloodstream infections" quickly: start with the summary and abstract, then check the authors, source, topics, and related papers. From here, open Scollr to follow Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing research, save the paper, or map adjacent work.
Research areas
Follow related topics
Citation
BibTeX
@article{Nitayanon2026panel,
title = {Off-panel resistance determinants in a high-resistance setting: comparative evaluation of syndromic multiplex PCR, metagenomic sequencing, and phenotypic AST in bloodstream infections},
author = {Perapon Nitayanon and Sethapong Phoonthong and Maleewan Theerawatthananon Peizner and Sidaphat Kraipasspong and Witchuda Kamolvit and Supathep Tansirichaiya},
journal = {Microbiology Spectrum},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.1128/spectrum.03252-26},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.03252-26}
}
FAQ
Using this paper in a discovery workflow
How do I find related work for this paper?
Use the related papers and topic links on this page as starting points. In Scollr, you can also open the paper and build a literature map around its references, citing papers, and related work.
How can I keep up with new Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing research papers?
Follow Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing research in Scollr. New papers from the topic flow into a personalized feed, and you can save useful studies to revisit later.
Can I cite this paper from this page?
This page includes a static BibTeX block for Off-panel resistance determinants in a high-resistance setting: comparative evaluation of syndromic multiplex PCR, metagenomic sequencing, and phenotypic AST in bloodstream infections. Always verify the DOI, source, and publication details against the publisher record before submitting a manuscript.
Follow this research in Scollr
Follow the topics and authors behind this paper, save useful studies, and build a literature map when you are ready to go deeper.
Get the app