Scollr summary
What this paper is about
A comparative experiment conducted by reconstructing three environments using manual modeling and two photogrammetry tools based on distinct technologies revealed that photogrammetry significantly accelerates the modeling process but does not consistently outperform manual modeling in terms of polygonal optimization and real-time rendering efficiency.
Full abstract
Read the full abstract
Abstract The development of the metaverse relies on the creation of realistic, immersive, and high-performance 3D scenes. For such a reason, manual construction of these scenes remains a time-consuming process that requires advanced technical skills, posing a significant barrier to widespread adoption. Recent advancements in AI-assisted photogrammetry tools offer an alternative approach by enabling semi-automatic 3D reconstruction from real-world environments. Nevertheless, the usability, quality, and real-time applicability of the resulting assets remain underexplored.This study aims to assess the effectiveness of photogrammetry-based tools for creating functional and visually appealing 3D scenes for metaverse applications.To this end, a comparative experiment was conducted by reconstructing three environments using manual modeling and two photogrammetry tools based on distinct technologies: Polycam (MVS-based) and LumaAI (NeRF-based). The resulting models were evaluated using quantitative metrics, including modeling time, polygon count, visual similarity (SSIM), real-time performance (GPU usage and FPS), and Hausdorff distance.The findings revealed that photogrammetry significantly accelerates the modeling process but does not consistently outperform manual modeling in terms of polygonal optimization and real-time rendering efficiency. Furthermore, the choice between photogrammetry tools depends on object characteristics and application constraints.This study provides practical insights and empirical guidelines for developers and researchers, highlighting the trade-offs between automation, performance, and visual fidelity in 3D scene generation for the metaverse.
Direct answer
What can I do from this paper page?
Use this page to scan "Towards AI-powered automatic 3D scene generation for the metaverse: a comparative analysis of manual and photogrammetry techniques" quickly: start with the summary and abstract, then check the authors, source, topics, and related papers. From here, open Scollr to follow 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage research, save the paper, or map adjacent work.
Research areas
Follow related topics
Citation
BibTeX
@article{Pentangelo2026Towards,
title = {Towards AI-powered automatic 3D scene generation for the metaverse: a comparative analysis of manual and photogrammetry techniques},
author = {Viviana Pentangelo and Dario Di Dario and Vincenzo De Martino and Marco Dello Buono and Stefano Lambiase},
journal = {Cluster Computing},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.1007/s10586-026-06530-x},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-026-06530-x}
}
FAQ
Using this paper in a discovery workflow
How do I find related work for this paper?
Use the related papers and topic links on this page as starting points. In Scollr, you can also open the paper and build a literature map around its references, citing papers, and related work.
How can I keep up with new 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage research papers?
Follow 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage research in Scollr. New papers from the topic flow into a personalized feed, and you can save useful studies to revisit later.
Can I cite this paper from this page?
This page includes a static BibTeX block for Towards AI-powered automatic 3D scene generation for the metaverse: a comparative analysis of manual and photogrammetry techniques. Always verify the DOI, source, and publication details against the publisher record before submitting a manuscript.
Follow this research in Scollr
Follow the topics and authors behind this paper, save useful studies, and build a literature map when you are ready to go deeper.
Get the app