Jury Decision Making Processes
Open access
Peer reviewed
Abstract
Abstract
Abstract This study explores racial differences in public perceptions of key standards of proof, specifically “beyond a reasonable doubt” and “preponderance of the evidence,” as well as evaluations of impartiality toward juries with varying racial compositions in the U.S. criminal justice system. Using data from 1,193 respondents, we find that White and Black respondents differ in their interpretations of guilt and liability: Black respondents generally apply stricter qualitative views of “beyond a reasonable doubt” and more lenient qualitative interpretations of “preponderance of the evidence,” and lower quantitative thresholds than White respondents for both standards. Black respondents also expressed greater confidence in the impartiality of racially diverse and all-Black juries than in all-White juries. These patterns suggest that White and Black respondents perceive standards of proof and jury impartiality through distinct racial lenses.
Direct answer
What can I do from this paper page?
Use this page to scan "Racial Differences in Interpretations of Standards of Proof and Jury Impartiality in the U.S. Criminal Justice System" quickly: start with the summary and abstract, then check the authors, source, topics, and related papers. From here, open Scollr to follow Jury Decision Making Processes research, save the paper, or map adjacent work.
Research areas
Follow related topics
Citation
BibTeX
@article{Hansen2026Racial,
title = {Racial Differences in Interpretations of Standards of Proof and Jury Impartiality in the U.S. Criminal Justice System},
author = {Michael A. Hansen and John C. Navarro},
journal = {American Journal of Criminal Justice},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.1007/s12103-026-09949-5},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-026-09949-5}
}FAQ
Using this paper in a discovery workflow
How do I find related work for this paper?
Use the related papers and topic links on this page as starting points. In Scollr, you can also open the paper and build a literature map around its references, citing papers, and related work.
How can I keep up with new Jury Decision Making Processes research papers?
Follow Jury Decision Making Processes research in Scollr. New papers from the topic flow into a personalized feed, and you can save useful studies to revisit later.
Can I cite this paper from this page?
This page includes a static BibTeX block for Racial Differences in Interpretations of Standards of Proof and Jury Impartiality in the U.S. Criminal Justice System. Always verify the DOI, source, and publication details against the publisher record before submitting a manuscript.
Follow this research in Scollr
Follow the topics and authors behind this paper, save useful studies, and build a literature map when you are ready to go deeper.
Get the app