Scollr summary
What this paper is about
Simulations of advanced generations showed that training on multiple generations increases GS accuracy, both for global and within-family prediction, both for global and within-family prediction.
Full abstract
Read the full abstract
Abstract Genomic selection (GS) could be used to reduce the long cycle time for tree breeding. This assumes that marker-based predictions are sufficiently accurate without phenotypes. We evaluated GS across two linked generations of Norway spruce ( Picea abies (L.) H. Karst), the first consisting of 954 plus-trees (G0) and the second of 956 progeny trees representing 34 full-sib families (G1), using 16 clonal field trials across mid- and southern Sweden. Both generations were measured for height and genotyped using a 50 K SNP chip array. Cross-validations within and across generations were compared. GS efficiency was evaluated using global prediction accuracy and within-family predictive ability, using GBLUP with phenotypes for independent validation. We used computer simulations to emulate the experimental data and repeat the same analysis under different assumptions of effective population size. Additional simulations were performed to investigate the cross-generation GS accuracy in future generations. Simulations assuming a historical effective population size of 1000 or 5000, together with experimental results, indicate that prediction accuracy decreased by 49–76% for global prediction and by 15–65% for within-family prediction when G1 was predicted from G0, compared with cross-validation within the G1 generation. Increasing the relatedness at the expense of training set size increased global accuracy but decreased within-family accuracy. Simulations of advanced generations showed that training on multiple generations increases GS accuracy, both for global and within-family prediction. Access to multiple generations for training and/or a higher density of markers may be recommended to increase accuracy for cross-generation and within-family GS in conifers.
Direct answer
What can I do from this paper page?
Use this page to scan "Cross-generational decline in genomic selection accuracy in Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) H. Karst) and strategies to mitigate it" quickly: start with the summary and abstract, then check the authors, source, topics, and related papers. From here, open Scollr to follow Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock research, save the paper, or map adjacent work.
Research areas
Follow related topics
Citation
BibTeX
@article{Carlsson2026Cross,
title = {Cross-generational decline in genomic selection accuracy in Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) H. Karst) and strategies to mitigate it},
author = {Edward A. Carlsson and Henrik R. Hallingbäck and Jon Ahlinder and Mari Suontama and Harry X. Wu},
journal = {Journal of Forestry Research},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.1007/s11676-026-02108-w},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-026-02108-w}
}
FAQ
Using this paper in a discovery workflow
How do I find related work for this paper?
Use the related papers and topic links on this page as starting points. In Scollr, you can also open the paper and build a literature map around its references, citing papers, and related work.
How can I keep up with new Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock research papers?
Follow Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock research in Scollr. New papers from the topic flow into a personalized feed, and you can save useful studies to revisit later.
Can I cite this paper from this page?
This page includes a static BibTeX block for Cross-generational decline in genomic selection accuracy in Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) H. Karst) and strategies to mitigate it. Always verify the DOI, source, and publication details against the publisher record before submitting a manuscript.
Follow this research in Scollr
Follow the topics and authors behind this paper, save useful studies, and build a literature map when you are ready to go deeper.
Get the app