Abstract
Abstract
Abstract Dialogic peer feedback in synchronous online discussions provides multiple educational benefits; however, its implementation is often constrained by students’ cognitive and interactional limitations. To address this issue, this study investigated the effects of argumentation scaffold and role assignment on students’ emotion, social metacognition, and discourse patterns in dialogic peer feedback. A quasi-experimental design was employed, involving 98 undergraduates assigned to four conditions: (a) dialogic peer feedback only (DF; control group; n = 24); (b) scaffolded dialogic peer feedback (SDF; argumentation scaffold only; n = 24); (c) role-assigned dialogic peer feedback (RDF; role assignment only; n = 25); and (d) scaffolded, role-assigned dialogic peer feedback (SRDF; combination of argumentation scaffold and role assignment; n = 25). Results showed that argumentation scaffold enhanced students’ positive emotion, social metacognition knowledge, and social metacognition judgment, whereas adding role assignment reduced these benefits. Discourse patterns further indicated that the SDF promoted deeper argumentation, the RDF increased participation, and the SRDF supported higher-level cognitive engagement. These findings suggest that argumentation scaffold and role assignment shape dialogic peer feedback in distinct ways, with scaffold strengthening the quality of reasoning and role assignment redistributing interactional participation.
Direct answer
What can I do from this paper page?
Use this page to scan "Fostering dialogic peer feedback in synchronous online discussions: the effect of argumentation scaffold and role assignment" quickly: start with the summary and abstract, then check the authors, source, topics, and related papers. From here, open Scollr to follow Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods research, save the paper, or map adjacent work.
Research areas
Follow related topics
Citation
BibTeX
@article{231432026Fostering,
title = {Fostering dialogic peer feedback in synchronous online discussions: the effect of argumentation scaffold and role assignment},
author = {Yan Li (23143) and Xin Guo and Zhongling Pi and Qiuchen Yu and Jiumin Yang},
journal = {International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.1186/s41239-026-00603-y},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-026-00603-y}
}
FAQ
Using this paper in a discovery workflow
How do I find related work for this paper?
Use the related papers and topic links on this page as starting points. In Scollr, you can also open the paper and build a literature map around its references, citing papers, and related work.
How can I keep up with new Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods research papers?
Follow Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods research in Scollr. New papers from the topic flow into a personalized feed, and you can save useful studies to revisit later.
Can I cite this paper from this page?
This page includes a static BibTeX block for Fostering dialogic peer feedback in synchronous online discussions: the effect of argumentation scaffold and role assignment. Always verify the DOI, source, and publication details against the publisher record before submitting a manuscript.
Follow this research in Scollr
Follow the topics and authors behind this paper, save useful studies, and build a literature map when you are ready to go deeper.
Get the app