Scollr summary
What this paper is about
The novel AIO device for colorectal hybrid ESD is safe and effective, and it reduced the procedural time and cost compared to convention ESD.
Full abstract
Read the full abstract
INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to verify the efficacy and safety of a novel all-in-one device for colorectal hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We further evaluated its clinical outcomes and cost- effectiveness compared with conventional ESD. METHODS: All In One (AIO) assisted hybrid ESD was prospectively performed on 161 patients (173 colorectal neoplasms) across five centers from November 2021 to November 2022.The primary outcome was the en bloc resection rate. Secondary outcomes were the complete resection rate and the incidences of adverse events. For the secondary retrospective comparative analysis, 345 patients (362 colorectal neoplasms) who underwent conventional ESD in the lead center during the same period were retrospectively identified and include to compare with the AIO group for outcomes and cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: In the prospective study, the en bloc resection rate was 97.7% (169/173), and the complete resection rate was 94.2% (163/173). The intraoperative and postoperative bleeding rates were 4.6% (8/173) and 1.2% (2/173). No perforation or abdominal pain was observed, and the incidence of fever was 1.2% (2/173). In the propensity score-matched retrospective comparison, the en bloc resection rates were 97.8% in AIO groups and 96.3% in conventional group (p=0.722). The complete resection rates were 94.8% in both groups. There was no difference between the adverse events rates (all p>0.05). It also demonstrated significantly reduced procedural time and costs with AIO assisted hybrid ESD (both p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The novel AIO device for colorectal hybrid ESD is safe and effective. It also reduced the procedural time and cost compared to convention ESD.
Direct answer
What can I do from this paper page?
Use this page to scan "Efficacy and Safety of a Novel All In One Device for Colorectal Hybrid ESD: A Multicenter Prospective Study" quickly: start with the summary and abstract, then check the authors, source, topics, and related papers. From here, open Scollr to follow Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes research, save the paper, or map adjacent work.
Research areas
Follow related topics
Citation
BibTeX
@article{Bahetinuer2026Efficacy,
title = {Efficacy and Safety of a Novel All In One Device for Colorectal Hybrid ESD: A Multicenter Prospective Study},
author = {Jiashaer Bahetinuer and Song Bao-hui and Rong Lin and Rui Li and Lin Miao and Youxiang Chen and Xu-Cheng Huo and Ping-Hong Zhou and Ming‐Yan Cai},
journal = {Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.14309/ctg.0000000000001099},
url = {https://doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000001099}
}
FAQ
Using this paper in a discovery workflow
How do I find related work for this paper?
Use the related papers and topic links on this page as starting points. In Scollr, you can also open the paper and build a literature map around its references, citing papers, and related work.
How can I keep up with new Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes research papers?
Follow Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes research in Scollr. New papers from the topic flow into a personalized feed, and you can save useful studies to revisit later.
Can I cite this paper from this page?
This page includes a static BibTeX block for Efficacy and Safety of a Novel All In One Device for Colorectal Hybrid ESD: A Multicenter Prospective Study. Always verify the DOI, source, and publication details against the publisher record before submitting a manuscript.
Follow this research in Scollr
Follow the topics and authors behind this paper, save useful studies, and build a literature map when you are ready to go deeper.
Get the app