Scollr summary
What this paper is about
Bioceramic sealers demonstrate biological advantages but remain broadly equivalent to conventional resin-based sealers in clinical effectiveness, while extrusion variability and retreatment difficulty highlight practical limitations.
Full abstract
Read the full abstract
Abstract Background: Sealers are important to provide hermetic obturation of root canals. Traditional sealers have wide clinical applications but are limited by cytotoxicity, solubility, and biocompatibility. However, bioceramic sealers offer bioactivity, alkaline antibacterial properties, and dentin bonding are the properties of bioceramic sealers, which still have concerns of extrusion, retreatment, and fewer long-term studies are available. Objective: The objective of the study was to compare the clinical characteristics of bioceramic and conventional root canal sealers in permanent teeth. Methodology: The umbrella review was registered in PROSPERO and followed the guidelines of the Joanna Briggs Institute and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020. Seven databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Central, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, LILACS) as well as grey literature sources were searched comprehensively and in English. This last update of the search was made on May 10, 2026. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses that included randomized or clinical trials study designs were eligible. Data extraction and methodological appraisal (AMSTAR-2) was performed in duplicate. Results: A total of 17 systematic reviews (2021–2026) were included. In terms of postoperative pain, analgesic consumption, postoperative flare-up, radiographic healing, extrusion, retreatment difficulty, and long-term success, there was no difference between bioceramic and resin-based sealers. Minimal effect on pain at 24–48 h and somewhat beneficial healing were reported for bioceramic sealers, but the differences were small. There were no high-quality reviews identified, and 76% of the methodological appraisal of reviews was rated as being of a critically low quality, which reduced confidence in the conclusions. Conclusion: Bioceramic sealers demonstrate biological advantages but remain broadly equivalent to conventional resin-based sealers in clinical effectiveness. Observed short-term benefits are modest and not clinically decisive, while extrusion variability and retreatment difficulty highlight practical limitations.
Direct answer
What can I do from this paper page?
Use this page to scan "Bioceramic versus conventional endodontic sealers: An umbrella review" quickly: start with the summary and abstract, then check the authors, source, topics, and related papers. From here, open Scollr to follow Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments research, save the paper, or map adjacent work.
Research areas
Follow related topics
Citation
BibTeX
@article{Rayar2026Bioceramic,
title = {Bioceramic versus conventional endodontic sealers: An umbrella review},
author = {Sreeram Rayar and S. Delphine Priscilla Antony and Sandhya Raghu and Sadasiva Kadandale and Srilekha Jayakumar and Janani Karunakaran},
journal = {Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.4103/jcde.jcde_542_26},
url = {https://doi.org/10.4103/jcde.jcde_542_26}
}
FAQ
Using this paper in a discovery workflow
How do I find related work for this paper?
Use the related papers and topic links on this page as starting points. In Scollr, you can also open the paper and build a literature map around its references, citing papers, and related work.
How can I keep up with new Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments research papers?
Follow Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments research in Scollr. New papers from the topic flow into a personalized feed, and you can save useful studies to revisit later.
Can I cite this paper from this page?
This page includes a static BibTeX block for Bioceramic versus conventional endodontic sealers: An umbrella review. Always verify the DOI, source, and publication details against the publisher record before submitting a manuscript.
Follow this research in Scollr
Follow the topics and authors behind this paper, save useful studies, and build a literature map when you are ready to go deeper.
Get the app