Scollr summary
What this paper is about
Surgical planning should be individualized according to patient sex, age, hernia characteristics, and surgeon expertise, as population-level data suggest that greater use of minimally invasive techniques in high-volume centers is associated with improved patient-reported outcomes.
Full abstract
Read the full abstract
Groin hernia repair is among the most common surgical procedures worldwide, yet chronic postoperative pain and recurrence remain important long-term complications. This narrative review compares long-term outcomes after traditional open repair with minimally invasive laparoscopic approaches. Evidence was identified through a structured, non-systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library, supplemented by reference lists and current international guidelines. Laparoscopic repair is consistently associated with less acute and chronic postoperative pain than open mesh repair, while recurrence rates are broadly comparable when procedures are performed by adequately trained surgeons. However, laparoscopic repair has a steeper learning curve and outcomes are operator-dependent. Mesh-related complications, including seroma, infection, meshoma, and foreign body sensation, occur in a minority of patients but may substantially impair quality of life. Tissue-based repairs, particularly the Shouldice and Desarda techniques, remain valid options for selected patients in experienced hands. Robotic-assisted repair may offer ergonomic and educational advantages, but evidence of superior patient outcomes is limited, while operative times and costs are generally higher than with conventional laparoscopy. Population-level data suggest that greater use of minimally invasive techniques in high-volume centers is associated with improved patient-reported outcomes. Surgical planning should therefore be individualized according to patient sex, age, hernia characteristics, and surgeon expertise. Much of the available evidence is observational or registry-based rather than randomized, which should temper the strength of recommendations. Future priorities include exploring bioengineered mesh, genetic risk stratification, and the potential role of artificial intelligence in surgical decision-making, although these avenues remain at an early exploratory stage.
Direct answer
What can I do from this paper page?
Use this page to scan "Long-term complications of traditional and novel management of groin hernia: a narrative review" quickly: start with the summary and abstract, then check the authors, source, topics, and related papers. From here, open Scollr to follow Hernia repair and management research, save the paper, or map adjacent work.
Research areas
Follow related topics
Citation
BibTeX
@article{Rosenberg2026Long,
title = {Long-term complications of traditional and novel management of groin hernia: a narrative review},
author = {Jacob Rosenberg},
journal = {Current Medical Research and Opinion},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.1080/03007995.2026.2723580},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2026.2723580}
}
FAQ
Using this paper in a discovery workflow
How do I find related work for this paper?
Use the related papers and topic links on this page as starting points. In Scollr, you can also open the paper and build a literature map around its references, citing papers, and related work.
How can I keep up with new Hernia repair and management research papers?
Follow Hernia repair and management research in Scollr. New papers from the topic flow into a personalized feed, and you can save useful studies to revisit later.
Can I cite this paper from this page?
This page includes a static BibTeX block for Long-term complications of traditional and novel management of groin hernia: a narrative review. Always verify the DOI, source, and publication details against the publisher record before submitting a manuscript.
Follow this research in Scollr
Follow the topics and authors behind this paper, save useful studies, and build a literature map when you are ready to go deeper.
Get the app