Abstract
Abstract
Purpose Consumers are increasingly seeking seamless shopping experiences that integrate physical and digital touchpoints, leading to the rise of phygital retail environments. However, how consumers perceive and evaluate experience dimensions in phygital vs traditional retail settings remains underexplored. This study aims to decode consumer perceptions by comparing phygital and traditional retail touchpoints using sentiment and thematic analysis of Google Reviews. Design/methodology/approach This study uses social data analytics, leveraging sentiment and thematic analysis of Google Reviews to compare consumer experiences across phygital and traditional retail environments. Findings The results support distinct experience dimensions associated with phygital and traditional retail touchpoints. In line with the phygital experience framework, interaction between the shopper and frontline sales employees is a fundamental connector in a phygital environment. Research limitations/implications This study relies on publicly available Google Reviews, which may not fully capture all aspects of consumer experiences. Future research could integrate survey-based data or experimental studies to validate findings. Additionally, the study primarily focuses on sentiment and thematic analysis, leaving room for deeper predictive modeling of consumer preferences. Originality/value This study contributes to phygital retailing literature by offering a comparative sentiment-based perspective on consumer experiences in phygital and traditional retail environments. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, it is the first to decode consumer perceptions through Google Reviews using sentiment and thematic analysis. This research provides actionable insights for retail managers seeking to optimize both digital and physical touchpoints.
Direct answer
What can I do from this paper page?
Use this page to scan "Human-centric experience in phygital retail: a sentiment-based comparison of hybrid and traditional touchpoints" quickly: start with the summary and abstract, then check the authors, source, topics, and related papers. From here, open Scollr to follow Consumer Retail Behavior Studies research, save the paper, or map adjacent work.
Research areas
Follow related topics
Citation
BibTeX
@article{LecointreErickson2026Human,
title = {Human-centric experience in phygital retail: a sentiment-based comparison of hybrid and traditional touchpoints},
author = {Danielle Lecointre-Erickson and Safaa Adil and M. Laeeq Khan and Koffi Selom Agbokanzo and Mirna Bassily and Sourou Méatchi},
journal = {Journal of Services Marketing},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.1108/jsm-09-2025-0708},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1108/jsm-09-2025-0708}
}
FAQ
Using this paper in a discovery workflow
How do I find related work for this paper?
Use the related papers and topic links on this page as starting points. In Scollr, you can also open the paper and build a literature map around its references, citing papers, and related work.
How can I keep up with new Consumer Retail Behavior Studies research papers?
Follow Consumer Retail Behavior Studies research in Scollr. New papers from the topic flow into a personalized feed, and you can save useful studies to revisit later.
Can I cite this paper from this page?
This page includes a static BibTeX block for Human-centric experience in phygital retail: a sentiment-based comparison of hybrid and traditional touchpoints. Always verify the DOI, source, and publication details against the publisher record before submitting a manuscript.
Follow this research in Scollr
Follow the topics and authors behind this paper, save useful studies, and build a literature map when you are ready to go deeper.
Get the app