Psychological and Educational Research Studies
Open access
Peer reviewed
Abstract
Abstract
Abstract Curiosity, creative self-efficacy, and critical thinking are increasingly recognized as critical psychological capacities that drive science learning and achievement. Curiosity motivates exploration and inquiry, creative self-efficacy enables innovative problem-solving, and critical thinking supports evidence-based reasoning, all essential for success in STEM education. This study examines how these capacities relate to science achievement across six Asian education systems selected to represent diverse performance levels in PISA 2022: high-performing (Singapore, Macao-China), medium-performing (Vietnam, Mongolia), and low-performing (Philippines, Indonesia) systems. Drawing on 44,689 students nested within 1,181 schools, multi-item indices were constructed from PISA questionnaire data, showing acceptable-to-strong reliability (curiosity α = 0.65; creative self-efficacy α = 0.81; critical thinking α = 0.69). Weighted mixed-effects models accounting for school-level clustering (ICC = 0.301–0.351) were estimated separately for each of ten plausible values and combined using Rubin’s rules. Across the pooled analytic sample, curiosity showed a significant negative within-school association with science achievement (β = −13.225, 95% CI [− 17.634, − 8.816]), while creative self-efficacy demonstrated a positive within-school relationship (β = 6.916, 95% CI [2.543, 11.290]) and critical thinking a modest non-significant positive association (β = 4.110, 95% CI [− 0.672, 8.892]) after adjusting for socioeconomic background and demographics. Country-level analyses revealed curiosity was consistently negative across all six systems (β range: −8.771 to − 19.306), creative self-efficacy was context-dependent, and critical thinking showed variable patterns. Findings reveal that the within-school influence of STEM-related dispositions on science achievement is shaped by school-level contextual factors and highlight the importance of institutional conditions in moderating how psychological capacities translate into academic performance across diverse educational systems.
Direct answer
What can I do from this paper page?
Use this page to scan "The impact of students’ STEM capacities on science achievement in six Asian countries" quickly: start with the summary and abstract, then check the authors, source, topics, and related papers. From here, open Scollr to follow Psychological and Educational Research Studies, save the paper, or map adjacent work.
Research areas
Follow related topics
Citation
BibTeX
@article{Atiatorme2026impact,
title = {The impact of students’ STEM capacities on science achievement in six Asian countries},
author = {Emmanuel Atiatorme and Fidelis Chinedu Onwunyili and John Amoako Mensah and Adam Maltese},
journal = {Discover Education},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.1007/s44217-026-01942-8},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-026-01942-8}
}FAQ
Using this paper in a discovery workflow
How do I find related work for this paper?
Use the related papers and topic links on this page as starting points. In Scollr, you can also open the paper and build a literature map around its references, citing papers, and related work.
How can I keep up with new Psychological and Educational Research Studies papers?
Follow Psychological and Educational Research Studies in Scollr. New papers from the topic flow into a personalized feed, and you can save useful studies to revisit later.
Can I cite this paper from this page?
This page includes a static BibTeX block for The impact of students’ STEM capacities on science achievement in six Asian countries. Always verify the DOI, source, and publication details against the publisher record before submitting a manuscript.
Follow this research in Scollr
Follow the topics and authors behind this paper, save useful studies, and build a literature map when you are ready to go deeper.
Get the app