Abstract
Abstract
Digital payment adoption is widely believed to broaden the visible tax base, and prior work links cashless payments to smaller value-added tax (VAT) compliance gaps. Whether this effect is large enough to shift a country’s tax mix—the share of revenue from personal income tax (PIT), corporate income tax (CIT), and VAT—rather than raising each tax proportionately, remains untested. We examine this using a panel of 38 OECD countries in 2000–2022, instrumenting digital payment adoption with two time-invariant infrastructure-legacy proxies—broadband rollout timing and submarine cable distance—via two-stage least squares, benchmarked against naive OLS and two-way fixed effects. Naive OLS shows digital payment adoption significantly lowering the CIT and VAT shares of revenue, opposite to the base-broadening intuition; these associations vanish under instrumentation and fixed effects for every outcome. Weak-instrument-robust tests corroborate the null for three of the four outcomes; for VAT, where our overidentification and placebo evidence raise the most doubt about instrument validity, the weak-instrument-robust confidence set excludes zero, a result we treat as inconclusive given those same validity concerns rather than as either confirming an effect or corroborating the null. A cluster bootstrap and lagged and extended-control specifications corroborate the null throughout, while a placebo test shows that our instruments correlate with pre-sample tax composition, a genuine limitation we report in full. The two-way fixed-effects results, which do not rely on these instruments and are therefore not exposed to that specific confounder (though, like any fixed-effects design, it cannot rule out time-varying confounding), corroborate the same null and are weighted as the most credible evidence. We interpret the results as evidence against an economically meaningful, robust association between digital payment adoption and OECD tax composition, rather than as a causally identified null effect—a pattern at least consistent with the possibility that mature tax administrations had already captured most realizable enforcement gains from digitalization before 2000.
Direct answer
What can I do from this paper page?
Use this page to scan "Does Digital Payment Adoption Reshape the Tax Mix? An Instrumental-Variables Analysis of Tax Composition in 38 OECD Countries, 2000–2022" quickly: start with the summary and abstract, then check the authors, source, topics, and related papers. From here, open Scollr to follow Taxation and Compliance Studies research, save the paper, or map adjacent work.
Research areas
Follow related topics
Citation
BibTeX
@article{AlQudah2026Does,
title = {Does Digital Payment Adoption Reshape the Tax Mix? An Instrumental-Variables Analysis of Tax Composition in 38 OECD Countries, 2000–2022},
author = {Anas Ali Al-Qudah and Doha Alshlool},
journal = {Journal of risk and financial management},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.3390/jrfm19100756},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm19100756}
}
FAQ
Using this paper in a discovery workflow
How do I find related work for this paper?
Use the related papers and topic links on this page as starting points. In Scollr, you can also open the paper and build a literature map around its references, citing papers, and related work.
How can I keep up with new Taxation and Compliance Studies research papers?
Follow Taxation and Compliance Studies research in Scollr. New papers from the topic flow into a personalized feed, and you can save useful studies to revisit later.
Can I cite this paper from this page?
This page includes a static BibTeX block for Does Digital Payment Adoption Reshape the Tax Mix? An Instrumental-Variables Analysis of Tax Composition in 38 OECD Countries, 2000–2022. Always verify the DOI, source, and publication details against the publisher record before submitting a manuscript.
Follow this research in Scollr
Follow the topics and authors behind this paper, save useful studies, and build a literature map when you are ready to go deeper.
Get the app