Abstract
Abstract
Cranioplasty in the pediatric population presents unique challenges due to ongoing skull growth, variable bone quality, and material-specific risks. This study reviews an 18-year experience of pediatric cranioplasty at a national referral center, evaluating complication and revision rates across autologous and synthetic implant types. A retrospective chart review was performed for all patients aged younger than or equal to 16 years who underwent cranioplasty between 2006 and 2023. Data collected included demographics, implant material, storage method for autologous bone, defect characteristics, and postoperative outcomes. A total of 103 cranioplasties were performed in 94 patients, with a mean age of 10.3 years and mean defect size of 77.7 cm2. Autologous bone was used in 52.4% of cases, hydroxyapatite in 29.1%, titanium in 10.7%, and polyetheretherketone (PEEK)/patient‑specific implants (PSI) in 7.8%. Overall complication and revision rates were 11.7% and 9.7%, respectively. Autologous bone showed the highest resorption rate (11.1%), particularly in cryopreserved flaps. Hydroxyapatite demonstrated the lowest complication rate (6.7%) but was associated with pseudomeningocele formation. PEEK/PSI implants had favorable outcomes, with one infection in a patient with extensive prior surgical intervention. Titanium implants had low complication rates but were discontinued due to patient-reported morbidity, including cold sensitivity and soft-tissue discomfort. This large single-center series highlights the importance of tailored material selection in pediatric cranial reconstruction. Although autologous bone remains widely used, synthetic materials offer favorable complication profiles. Long-term, multicentre outcomes are required to determine optimal implant choice across age groups and defect sizes.
Direct answer
What can I do from this paper page?
Use this page to scan "Pediatric Cranioplasty in Ireland 2006 to 2023: An 18-Year Retrospective Review" quickly: start with the summary and abstract, then check the authors, source, topics, and related papers. From here, open Scollr to follow Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances research, save the paper, or map adjacent work.
Research areas
Follow related topics
Citation
BibTeX
@article{Goodman2026Pediatric,
title = {Pediatric Cranioplasty in Ireland 2006 to 2023: An 18-Year Retrospective Review},
author = {Dáire T Goodman and Róisín Pollock and Charlotte Loh and Shirley Bracken and Shaal Ramdial and John Caird and Darach Crimmins and Dylan J. Murray},
journal = {Journal of Craniofacial Surgery},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.1097/scs.0000000000012930},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000012930}
}
FAQ
Using this paper in a discovery workflow
How do I find related work for this paper?
Use the related papers and topic links on this page as starting points. In Scollr, you can also open the paper and build a literature map around its references, citing papers, and related work.
How can I keep up with new Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances research papers?
Follow Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances research in Scollr. New papers from the topic flow into a personalized feed, and you can save useful studies to revisit later.
Can I cite this paper from this page?
This page includes a static BibTeX block for Pediatric Cranioplasty in Ireland 2006 to 2023: An 18-Year Retrospective Review. Always verify the DOI, source, and publication details against the publisher record before submitting a manuscript.
Follow this research in Scollr
Follow the topics and authors behind this paper, save useful studies, and build a literature map when you are ready to go deeper.
Get the app