Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Peer reviewed
Abstract
Abstract
Although anticipating rewards and punishments facilitates behavioral performance, the role of controllability in shaping the integrative effects of these incentives remains unclear. To address this gap, we conducted two experiments using the Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) task and electroencephalography (EEG) recordings, aiming to investigate how controllability influences the effects of reward and punishment information on behavioral responses and their underlying neural mechanisms. In both experiments, the procedure followed a consistent structure: a cue indicating the reward and punishment condition was presented first, after which participants completed a task requiring fast and accurate responses, with feedback delivered afterward. In Experiment 1, reward delivery was contingent on participants' task performance, whereas punishment was delivered randomly. In contrast, Experiment 2 tied punishment delivery to performance, while reward was delivered randomly. Behaviorally, reaction times were significantly faster when participants anticipated controllable incentives-specifically, rewards in Experiment 1 and punishments in Experiment 2-without sacrificing response accuracy. For event-related potentials (ERPs), cue-related components (cue-N2, cue-P3, contingent negative variation [CNV], pre-feedback stimulus-preceding negativity [SPN]) showed consistent modulation by controllable incentives across both experiments. Additionally, the CNV was also influenced by uncontrollable rewards in Experiment 2. Results for the feedback-related negativity (FRN) and feedback-P3 consistently supported the salience prediction error account: outcomes involving reward (vs. no-reward) and punishment (vs. no-punishment) elicited more positive amplitudes. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that individuals are sensitive to both reward and punishment information, with heightened sensitivity to outcomes that are controllable, as reflected in both behavioral performance and neural activity.
Direct answer
What can I do from this paper page?
Use this page to scan "Controllability Determines the Incentive Effect of Reward and Punishment: EEG Evidence" quickly: start with the summary and abstract, then check the authors, source, topics, and related papers. From here, open Scollr to follow Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies research, save the paper, or map adjacent work.
Research areas
Follow related topics
Citation
BibTeX
@article{Zhan2026Controllability,
title = {Controllability Determines the Incentive Effect of Reward and Punishment: EEG Evidence},
author = {Yanru Zhan and Fei Dong and Y Zhang and Ping Wei},
journal = {Psychophysiology},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.1111/psyp.70336},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70336}
}FAQ
Using this paper in a discovery workflow
How do I find related work for this paper?
Use the related papers and topic links on this page as starting points. In Scollr, you can also open the paper and build a literature map around its references, citing papers, and related work.
How can I keep up with new Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies research papers?
Follow Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies research in Scollr. New papers from the topic flow into a personalized feed, and you can save useful studies to revisit later.
Can I cite this paper from this page?
This page includes a static BibTeX block for Controllability Determines the Incentive Effect of Reward and Punishment: EEG Evidence. Always verify the DOI, source, and publication details against the publisher record before submitting a manuscript.
Follow this research in Scollr
Follow the topics and authors behind this paper, save useful studies, and build a literature map when you are ready to go deeper.
Get the app