Abstract
Abstract
This paper presents a large-scale behavioural-cloning benchmark of linear-programming (LP) truck dispatch in commercial open-pit mining, quantifying how much of the LP policy is recoverable from observable cycle records and which learning models recover it. Drawing on 983,025 LP dispatch decisions across four operational years at a large copper mine, four learned model families are compared under an identical, strictly causal feature set and a strict temporal hold-out (Year 5)—a 72,681-parameter multilayer perceptron (MLP), Random Forest, LightGBM, and XGBoost—against five non-parametric baselines. Gradient-boosted trees recover substantially more of the LP policy than the MLP: XGBoost attains 41.04% top-one and 79.50% top-three accuracy (95% CI [40.80, 41.30]), and LightGBM 39.70%/77.95%, both significantly exceeding the cycle-continuity heuristic (35.21%/67.32%) and the MLP (32.4%/68.8%) by McNemar tests (all p < 0.001). The dataset is highly imbalanced (normalized entropy 0.814; imbalance ratio 16,921:1), and front-end-loader classes with negligible support are not learnable. Permutation analysis shows the truck’s previous shovel dominates the MLP policy (+7.46 pp), yet XGBoost exceeds the previous-shovel-only Bayes-optimal accuracy of 32.40%, demonstrating that observable features beyond previous shovel carry exploitable signal the MLP fails to capture. A learning-curve ablation shows the gradient-boosting advantage is attributable to model architecture rather than training-data volume and is robust to hyperparameter choice, consistent with the established behaviour of tree ensembles on tabular data. The results indicate a learnability ceiling that sits well above the MLP and is partly model-limited rather than purely informational; they also show that imitation fidelity is distinct from dispatch quality, which is not assessed here. The study reframes behavioural cloning of commercial FMS dispatch as a diagnostic and benchmarking tool and motivates model choice, imbalance-aware learning, and richer state recovery as the levers for data-driven dispatch analysis.
Direct answer
What can I do from this paper page?
Use this page to scan "How Learnable Is LP Truck Dispatch? A Multi-Model Behavioural Cloning Benchmark of 983,000 Industrial Dispatch Cycles" quickly: start with the summary and abstract, then check the authors, source, topics, and related papers. From here, open Scollr to follow Mining Techniques and Economics research, save the paper, or map adjacent work.
Research areas
Follow related topics
Citation
BibTeX
@article{Kahraman2026Learnable,
title = {How Learnable Is LP Truck Dispatch? A Multi-Model Behavioural Cloning Benchmark of 983,000 Industrial Dispatch Cycles},
author = {Muhammet Mustafa Kahraman},
journal = {Mining},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.3390/mining6030047},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/mining6030047}
}
FAQ
Using this paper in a discovery workflow
How do I find related work for this paper?
Use the related papers and topic links on this page as starting points. In Scollr, you can also open the paper and build a literature map around its references, citing papers, and related work.
How can I keep up with new Mining Techniques and Economics research papers?
Follow Mining Techniques and Economics research in Scollr. New papers from the topic flow into a personalized feed, and you can save useful studies to revisit later.
Can I cite this paper from this page?
This page includes a static BibTeX block for How Learnable Is LP Truck Dispatch? A Multi-Model Behavioural Cloning Benchmark of 983,000 Industrial Dispatch Cycles. Always verify the DOI, source, and publication details against the publisher record before submitting a manuscript.
Follow this research in Scollr
Follow the topics and authors behind this paper, save useful studies, and build a literature map when you are ready to go deeper.
Get the app