Scollr summary
What this paper is about
A synthesis of existing literature conceptualized secondary school teacher digital competence into four primary dimensions—Digital Technology Knowledge, Digital Technology Application, Digital Content Creation, and Digital Technology Problem Solving—encompassing twelve specific indicators.
Full abstract
Read the full abstract
The primary objectives of this study were twofold: (1) to delineate the essential components and indicators of digital competence specific to secondary school teachers; and (2) to evaluate the consistency between the proposed component–indicator model and empirical data. The study population comprised 240 secondary school teachers affiliated with the Office of the Basic Education Commission (OBEC) in Northeastern Thailand. A multistage random sampling technique was utilized, with the sample size calculated based on a 20:1 parameter-to-sample ratio. The research instrument was a specialized questionnaire developed to assess digital competence. Content validity was confirmed via the Index of Item–Objective Congruence (IOC), yielding values ranging from 0.80 to 1.00. Item discrimination, assessed using Pearson’s product–moment correlation coefficient, ranged from 0.32 to 0.84 , and the instrument demonstrated high internal consistency with a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient (α) of 0.97. Statistical validation was conducted using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). The analysis yielded two key findings. First, a synthesis of existing literature conceptualized secondary school teacher digital competence into four primary dimensions—Digital Technology Knowledge, Digital Technology Application, Digital Content Creation, and Digital Technology Problem Solving—encompassing twelve specific indicators. Second, the hypothesized model demonstrated a high degree of congruence with the empirical data. The goodness-of-fit indices (x^2/df = 31.187, df = 35, p = 0.653, GFI = 0.978, CFI = 1.000, RMSEA = 0.000) confirm the model’s robustness, validating the instrument’s efficacy for assessing digital competence within this educational context.
Direct answer
What can I do from this paper page?
Use this page to scan "Components and Indicators of Digital Competence for Secondary School Teachers" quickly: start with the summary and abstract, then check the authors, source, topics, and related papers. From here, open Scollr to follow Digital literacy in education research, save the paper, or map adjacent work.
Research areas
Follow related topics
Citation
BibTeX
@article{Suwannatrai2026Components,
title = {Components and Indicators of Digital Competence for Secondary School Teachers},
author = {Suwaruk Suwannatrai and Pacharawit Chansirisira and Suwat Julsuwan},
journal = {Journal of Education and Learning},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.5539/jel.v15n5p410},
url = {https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v15n5p410}
}
FAQ
Using this paper in a discovery workflow
How do I find related work for this paper?
Use the related papers and topic links on this page as starting points. In Scollr, you can also open the paper and build a literature map around its references, citing papers, and related work.
How can I keep up with new Digital literacy in education research papers?
Follow Digital literacy in education research in Scollr. New papers from the topic flow into a personalized feed, and you can save useful studies to revisit later.
Can I cite this paper from this page?
This page includes a static BibTeX block for Components and Indicators of Digital Competence for Secondary School Teachers. Always verify the DOI, source, and publication details against the publisher record before submitting a manuscript.
Follow this research in Scollr
Follow the topics and authors behind this paper, save useful studies, and build a literature map when you are ready to go deeper.
Get the app