Scollr summary
What this paper is about
The discrete half of a coordinated diptych whose continuous companion proves a matching rate–distortion converse for non-finite semantic spaces is the discrete half of a coordinated diptych whose continuous companion proves a matching rate–distortion converse for non-finite semantic spaces.
Full abstract
Read the full abstract
Abstract Floridi’s Certainty–Scope Conjecture holds that no artificial intelligence system can be simultaneously reliable on every input and broad enough to cover the full richness of unstructured data: reliability and breadth are in structural tension, imposed by the finite information-processing capacity of any mechanism implementing intelligence. The Conjecture has until now been a philosophical thesis without a proof. This article supplies one in the finite-classification regime—the simplest non-trivial setting in which the Conjecture admits an exact statement, a sharp converse, and a matching achievability result—and is the discrete half of a coordinated diptych whose continuous companion proves a matching rate–distortion converse for non-finite semantic spaces. The technical machinery is classical: taking certainty to be Bayes-optimal accuracy and scope to be the class count n , a Fano-type argument yields a converse binding certainty and scope against mechanism capacity, with the n -ary symmetric channel attaining the exact certainty form with equality; the simplified explicit upper bound has asymptotic slack $$\ln 2/\ln n$$ on the certainty scale. Six structural extensions carry the philosophical weight. Multi-task composition compounds scope multiplicatively, so joint certainty decays as O (1/ T ); fixed-bandwidth side information yields vanishing gains; static post-processing of the mechanism’s output adds zero augmented capacity, placing chain-of-thought (so idealised) on the wrong side of the bound; sequential tool use requires logarithmically growing query counts; routing does not lift the local constraint; and context-wise feasibility need not compose into global feasibility. A synthetic bottleneck experiment illustrates the bound’s bite, with an analytical account of harder regimes via the Bhattacharyya bound. The diptych’s discrete-side engagement with Lissack, Immediato, and Watson and Sterkenburg is recorded.
Direct answer
What can I do from this paper page?
Use this page to scan "A Limit of AI, I: A Discrete Information-Theoretic Proof of the Certainty–Scope Conjecture" quickly: start with the summary and abstract, then check the authors, source, topics, and related papers. From here, open Scollr to follow Diverse Interdisciplinary Research Studies, save the paper, or map adjacent work.
Research areas
Follow related topics
Citation
BibTeX
@article{Jia2026Limit,
title = {A Limit of AI, I: A Discrete Information-Theoretic Proof of the Certainty–Scope Conjecture},
author = {Yiyang Jia and Alberto Messina and Luciano Floridi},
journal = {Minds and Machines},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.1007/s11023-026-09796-7},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-026-09796-7}
}
FAQ
Using this paper in a discovery workflow
How do I find related work for this paper?
Use the related papers and topic links on this page as starting points. In Scollr, you can also open the paper and build a literature map around its references, citing papers, and related work.
How can I keep up with new Diverse Interdisciplinary Research Studies papers?
Follow Diverse Interdisciplinary Research Studies in Scollr. New papers from the topic flow into a personalized feed, and you can save useful studies to revisit later.
Can I cite this paper from this page?
This page includes a static BibTeX block for A Limit of AI, I: A Discrete Information-Theoretic Proof of the Certainty–Scope Conjecture. Always verify the DOI, source, and publication details against the publisher record before submitting a manuscript.
Follow this research in Scollr
Follow the topics and authors behind this paper, save useful studies, and build a literature map when you are ready to go deeper.
Get the app