Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices Open access Peer reviewed

Left ventricular unloading during VA-ECMO for refractory cardiogenic shock: a target trial emulation multicenter analysis

Angela Dettling, Ouriel Saura, Lisa Dilange, David Levy and 14 more

Critical Care | Aug 27, 2026

Scollr summary

What this paper is about

The need for a refined, phenotype-driven approach to patient selection for LV unloading in ECMO-supported cardiogenic shock is highlighted, as LV unloading during VA-ECMO was not associated with improved survival at 60 days.

Full abstract

Read the full abstract

BACKGROUND: Conflicting data exist regarding the survival benefit of mechanical left ventricular (LV) unloading in patients receiving peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for refractory cardiogenic shock (CS). In this study, we aimed to assess the effect of LV unloading (Impella or intra-aortic balloon pump [IABP]) on 60-day mortality in patients with refractory CS treated with VA-ECMO. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective bi-center study including consecutive patients requiring VA-ECMO for ≥ 48 h in two high-volume ECMO centers between 2019 and 2023, using the target trial emulation framework. Patients were classified as receiving VA-ECMO alone or VA-ECMO with LV unloading if the unloading strategy was applied within 24 h after ECMO implantation. Propensity-score overlap weighting was applied to adjust for baseline differences. The primary endpoint was 60-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included ECMO weaning rates and device-related complications. RESULTS: Among 264 patients (76% male, mean age 53 ± 14 years), 138 (52.2%) received VA-ECMO alone and 126 (47.8%) underwent LV unloading (78 IABP, 48 Impella), 2 were lost to follow-up. Unloading was not associated with improved 60-day mortality (weighted risk difference: 1.4% [95% CI: -11.8%, 14.6%], p = 0.84). No significant differences were observed in ECMO weaning rates, but device-related complications were more frequent in the unloading group. CONCLUSION: In this propensity-score weighted analysis, LV unloading during VA-ECMO was not associated with improved survival at 60 days. These hypothesis-generating findings highlight the need for a refined, phenotype-driven approach to patient selection for LV unloading in ECMO-supported cardiogenic shock.

Direct answer

What can I do from this paper page?

Use this page to scan "Left ventricular unloading during VA-ECMO for refractory cardiogenic shock: a target trial emulation multicenter analysis" quickly: start with the summary and abstract, then check the authors, source, topics, and related papers. From here, open Scollr to follow Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices research, save the paper, or map adjacent work.

Authors

Researchers on this paper

Angela Dettling

first | German Centre for Cardiovascular Research | ORCID 0000-0003-0992-0236

Ouriel Saura

middle | Inserm | ORCID 0000-0002-3565-3509

Lisa Dilange

middle | Inserm

David Levy

middle | Inserm

Manuela Lucenteforte

middle | University of Milan

Benedikt N. Beer

middle | German Centre for Cardiovascular Research

Charles Juvin

middle | Inserm

Jonas Sundermeyer

middle | German Centre for Cardiovascular Research | ORCID 0000-0002-0076-2211

Guillaume Hekimian

middle | Inserm

Marvin Kriz

middle | German Centre for Cardiovascular Research | ORCID 0009-0003-0823-2834

Alexander Bernhardt

middle

Stefan Kluge

middle | Universität Hamburg | ORCID 0000-0001-8391-3988

Research areas

Follow related topics

Citation

BibTeX

@article{Dettling2026Left,
  title = {Left ventricular unloading during VA-ECMO for refractory cardiogenic shock: a target trial emulation multicenter analysis},
  author = {Angela Dettling and Ouriel Saura and Lisa Dilange and David Levy and Manuela Lucenteforte and Benedikt N. Beer and Charles Juvin and Jonas Sundermeyer and Guillaume Hekimian and Marvin Kriz and Alexander Bernhardt and Stefan Kluge and Matthieu Schmidt and Pascal Leprince and Guillaume Lebreton and David Hajage and Benedikt Schrage and Alain Combes},
  journal = {Critical Care},
  year = {2026},
  doi = {10.1186/s13054-026-06213-4},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-026-06213-4}
}

FAQ

Using this paper in a discovery workflow

How do I find related work for this paper?

Use the related papers and topic links on this page as starting points. In Scollr, you can also open the paper and build a literature map around its references, citing papers, and related work.

How can I keep up with new Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices research papers?

Follow Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices research in Scollr. New papers from the topic flow into a personalized feed, and you can save useful studies to revisit later.

Can I cite this paper from this page?

This page includes a static BibTeX block for Left ventricular unloading during VA-ECMO for refractory cardiogenic shock: a target trial emulation multicenter analysis. Always verify the DOI, source, and publication details against the publisher record before submitting a manuscript.

Follow this research in Scollr

Follow the topics and authors behind this paper, save useful studies, and build a literature map when you are ready to go deeper.

Get the app