Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Open access
Peer reviewed
Abstract
Abstract
Front-of-package (FoP) warning labels (WLs) are widely used internationally to guide healthier food and beverage choices. China has not yet implemented a standard FoP system, and evidence on how different WL designs influence young Chinese consumers remains limited. This study examined the effects of two WL formats and explored how consumers perceived and responded to these labels. An explanatory mixed-methods design was used. A virtual online supermarket experiment assigned 159 participants to a Black-octagon WL group, a Black-shield WL group, or a No-FoP control group, and their beverage selections were recorded and analyzed. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 participants to explore perceptions and responses to WLs, and thematic analysis was used. Both WLs reduced the selection of high-sugar beverages compared with the control group. The Black-shield WL produced healthier choices than the Black-octagon WL, reflected in lower nutritional quality scores, energy content, and sugar content in selected beverages. Interviews identified four themes explaining these effects: visual characteristics shaping attractiveness and healthfulness perception, influence on consumer behavior, overall evaluation of WLs, and suggestions for improving design and implementation. WLs captured attention, increased risk perception, and triggered emotional responses that shaped choice. The shield label was viewed as more credible and acceptable, while the octagon label evoked stronger threat and occasional resistance. Both FoP WLs effectively reduced high sugar beverage choices among young Chinese consumers, and the Black-shield label showed stronger behavioral impact than the Black-octagon label. Young consumers viewed the shield as more credible and acceptable, while the octagon evoked stronger perceived threat and occasional resistance. These findings highlight the health-guiding value of WLs and provide culturally relevant evidence to inform China’s future FoP nutrition labeling policy.
Direct answer
What can I do from this paper page?
Use this page to scan "Evaluating warning label designs for front-of-package nutrition policy: evidence from an explanatory mixed-methods study among young Chinese consumers" quickly: start with the summary and abstract, then check the authors, source, topics, and related papers. From here, open Scollr to follow Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling research, save the paper, or map adjacent work.
Research areas
Follow related topics
Citation
BibTeX
@article{Guo2026Evaluating,
title = {Evaluating warning label designs for front-of-package nutrition policy: evidence from an explanatory mixed-methods study among young Chinese consumers},
author = {Zhiyi Guo and Muhizam Mustafa and Yueyue Ning},
journal = {Archives of Public Health},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.1186/s13690-026-02026-7},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-026-02026-7}
}FAQ
Using this paper in a discovery workflow
How do I find related work for this paper?
Use the related papers and topic links on this page as starting points. In Scollr, you can also open the paper and build a literature map around its references, citing papers, and related work.
How can I keep up with new Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling research papers?
Follow Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling research in Scollr. New papers from the topic flow into a personalized feed, and you can save useful studies to revisit later.
Can I cite this paper from this page?
This page includes a static BibTeX block for Evaluating warning label designs for front-of-package nutrition policy: evidence from an explanatory mixed-methods study among young Chinese consumers. Always verify the DOI, source, and publication details against the publisher record before submitting a manuscript.
Follow this research in Scollr
Follow the topics and authors behind this paper, save useful studies, and build a literature map when you are ready to go deeper.
Get the app