Abstract
Abstract
Harmonized laboratory methodologies, notably the CEPI recyclability laboratory test method (latest version 3, released February 2025) and the 4evergreen protocol (latest revision 1, released January 2025), are widely used to assess the recyclability of paper-based materials. However, the extent to which laboratory-scale results reflect pilot-scale behavior remains insufficiently documented. In this work, the recyclability of brown packaging paper was evaluated at both laboratory and pilot scales. Disintegration was performed under identical consistency, temperature, and duration, followed by screening, filtrate analysis, macro-stickies quantification, and paper sheet adhesion evaluation according to the CEPI methodology. In parallel, recycled paper prototypes were produced in a pilot paper machine and were mechanically characterized. The material was classified as technically recyclable in a conventional recycling mill at both scales, with closely aligned recyclability scores. Nevertheless, pilot-scale testing revealed higher dissolved and colloidal substances, increased macro-stickies content, and sheet adhesion phenomena not fully apparent at laboratory scale. These results demonstrate that while laboratory tests are robust for recyclability classification, pilot-scale trials provide essential insights into runnability and operational risks relevant for industrial implementation.
Direct answer
What can I do from this paper page?
Use this page to scan "Laboratory Scale vs. Pilot Scale Recyclability Evaluation of a Brown Packaging Paper Containing Strength Additive" quickly: start with the summary and abstract, then check the authors, source, topics, and related papers. From here, open Scollr to follow Material Properties and Processing research, save the paper, or map adjacent work.
Research areas
Follow related topics
Citation
BibTeX
@article{Vieira2026Laboratory,
title = {Laboratory Scale vs. Pilot Scale Recyclability Evaluation of a Brown Packaging Paper Containing Strength Additive},
author = {Joana C. Vieira and Pedro E. M. Videira and António de O. Mendes and Paula Pinto and Belinda Soares and Mariana P. Costa and Paulo T. Fiadeiro and Joana M. R. Curto and Maria E. Amaral and Ana Paula Costa and Vera L. D. Costa},
journal = {Recycling},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.3390/recycling11060107},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling11060107}
}
FAQ
Using this paper in a discovery workflow
How do I find related work for this paper?
Use the related papers and topic links on this page as starting points. In Scollr, you can also open the paper and build a literature map around its references, citing papers, and related work.
How can I keep up with new Material Properties and Processing research papers?
Follow Material Properties and Processing research in Scollr. New papers from the topic flow into a personalized feed, and you can save useful studies to revisit later.
Can I cite this paper from this page?
This page includes a static BibTeX block for Laboratory Scale vs. Pilot Scale Recyclability Evaluation of a Brown Packaging Paper Containing Strength Additive. Always verify the DOI, source, and publication details against the publisher record before submitting a manuscript.
Follow this research in Scollr
Follow the topics and authors behind this paper, save useful studies, and build a literature map when you are ready to go deeper.
Get the app