Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research Open access Peer reviewed

Comparative effectiveness of apalutamide‐, abiraterone‐, and enzalutamide‐based doublets in mHSPC

Anikó Katalin Valikovics, Dániel Bacsó, Nadeen Samaien, Isabel Pinto Amorim das Virgens and 6 more

British Journal of Urology | Sep 1, 2026

Scollr summary

What this paper is about

In real-world settings, APA-based doublets were associated with more favourable efficacy outcomes with ABI, whereas ABI- and ENZA-based regimens were associated with lower TDC rates, supporting individualized ARPI selection in mHSPC.

Full abstract

Read the full abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) has evolved from androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) alone to combination therapy with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors. Although apalutamide (APA), abiraterone (ABI), and enzalutamide (ENZA) improve outcomes when added to ADT, direct comparative trials between androgen receptor pathway inhibitor-based doublets are lacking. METHODS: Our systematic search was conducted on 22 September 2025, in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases. Studies including patients with mHSPC treated with APA, ABI, or ENZA plus ADT were eligible if they contained real-world data and reported at least one outcome: overall survival (OS), PSA50, PSA90, PSA ≤0.2 ng/mL, time to castration-resistant prostate cancer, biochemical progression-free survival, grade ≥3 adverse events, or treatment discontinuation (TDC). Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using inverse variance random-effects models. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: In total, 17 retrospective studies comprising 18 626 patients were included. Compared with ABI, APA was associated with improved OS (HR 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-1.47; P = 0.002), PSA90 (OR 0.70; 95% CI 0.54-0.91; P = 0.019), PSA <0.2 ng/mL (OR 0.49; 95% CI 0.25-0.95; P = 0.039), and castration-resistant prostate cancer (HR 1.40; 95% CI 1.05-1.88; P = 0.023). APA also demonstrated higher PSA90 response rates than ENZA (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.5-0.9; P = 0.017). TDC due to adverse events was lower with ABI than with APA (OR 0.56; 95% CI 0.37-0.86; P = 0.029), with no significant difference between ENZA and APA (P = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: In real-world settings, APA-based doublets were associated with more favourable efficacy outcomes with ABI, whereas ABI- and ENZA-based regimens were associated with lower TDC rates. ABI and ENZA demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety profiles, supporting individualized ARPI selection in mHSPC.

Direct answer

What can I do from this paper page?

Use this page to scan "Comparative effectiveness of apalutamide‐, abiraterone‐, and enzalutamide‐based doublets in mHSPC" quickly: start with the summary and abstract, then check the authors, source, topics, and related papers. From here, open Scollr to follow Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research, save the paper, or map adjacent work.

Authors

Researchers on this paper

Anikó Katalin Valikovics

first | Semmelweis University

Dániel Bacsó

middle | Semmelweis University

Nadeen Samaien

middle | Semmelweis University

Isabel Pinto Amorim das Virgens

middle | Semmelweis University | ORCID 0000-0001-5563-5837

Mahmoud Obeidat

middle | Semmelweis University | ORCID 0000-0002-2861-2573

Gergely Bánfi

middle | Semmelweis University

Boris Hadaschik

middle | West German Heart and Vascular Center Essen

Péter Hegyi

middle | Semmelweis University | ORCID 0000-0003-0399-7259

Péter Nyírády

middle | Semmelweis University | ORCID 0000-0002-7037-4919

Tibor Szarvas

last | Semmelweis University | ORCID 0000-0002-6321-0799

Research areas

Follow related topics

Citation

BibTeX

@article{Valikovics2026Comparative,
  title = {Comparative effectiveness of apalutamide‐, abiraterone‐, and enzalutamide‐based doublets in mHSPC},
  author = {Anikó Katalin Valikovics and Dániel Bacsó and Nadeen Samaien and Isabel Pinto Amorim das Virgens and Mahmoud Obeidat and Gergely Bánfi and Boris Hadaschik and Péter Hegyi and Péter Nyírády and Tibor Szarvas},
  journal = {British Journal of Urology},
  year = {2026},
  doi = {10.1111/bju.70438},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.70438}
}

FAQ

Using this paper in a discovery workflow

How do I find related work for this paper?

Use the related papers and topic links on this page as starting points. In Scollr, you can also open the paper and build a literature map around its references, citing papers, and related work.

How can I keep up with new Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research papers?

Follow Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research in Scollr. New papers from the topic flow into a personalized feed, and you can save useful studies to revisit later.

Can I cite this paper from this page?

This page includes a static BibTeX block for Comparative effectiveness of apalutamide‐, abiraterone‐, and enzalutamide‐based doublets in mHSPC. Always verify the DOI, source, and publication details against the publisher record before submitting a manuscript.

Follow this research in Scollr

Follow the topics and authors behind this paper, save useful studies, and build a literature map when you are ready to go deeper.

Get the app