Scollr summary
What this paper is about
It is concluded that DL-based genetic simulation models' ability to retain additive genetic variance depends on the models' architectural complexity, and when sufficiently complex, DL-based models exhibit greater retention of additive genetic variance.
Full abstract
Read the full abstract
In several simulation studies, long-term selection led to the rapid depletion of genetic variance. These outcomes differ from real-life observations that we aim to replicate, thereby highlighting a fundamental limitation of current classical quantitative genetic simulation models. Deep learning (DL) models have demonstrated promising results in capturing complex interactions essential for maintaining genetic variance; thus, we hypothesize that DL-based genetic simulation models may preserve more genetic variance than classical models, because the biological pathways underlying complex traits exhibit interactions that classical models ignore. The primary objective of this study was to introduce alternative DL-based genetic simulation models and compare them with classical genetic simulation models in terms of their retention of additive genetic variance under truncation selection in a simulated full-sib pig breeding scheme using real haplotypes as founders. After 20 generations of directional truncation selection, the classical models (A, ADAA, and ADAAADDD) retained between 55% and 64% of their initial additive genetic variance. In contrast, while the DL_simple model lost all its additive variance, the DL medium retained 92-98% of its additive variance, and the DL_complex model's initial additive variance increased by 296-314%. This paper introduces DL-based genetic simulation models and concludes that their ability to retain additive genetic variance depends on the models' architectural complexity. When sufficiently complex, DL-based models exhibit greater retention of additive genetic variance because they intrinsically capture epistatic interactions that are converted into additive variance, as selection progresses. Thus, affirming the role of non-additive genetic effects in maintaining long-term genetic variation.
Direct answer
What can I do from this paper page?
Use this page to scan "Using Deep Learning Models as a Genetic Architecture for the Simulation of Breeding Schemes" quickly: start with the summary and abstract, then check the authors, source, topics, and related papers. From here, open Scollr to follow Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock research, save the paper, or map adjacent work.
Research areas
Follow related topics
Citation
BibTeX
@article{Onabanjo2026Using,
title = {Using Deep Learning Models as a Genetic Architecture for the Simulation of Breeding Schemes},
author = {Olumide Onabanjo and Theo Meuwissen and Hans Magnus Gjøen and Emre Karaman and Thinh Tuan Chu and Peer Berg},
journal = {G3 Genes Genomes Genetics},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.1093/g3journal/jkag187},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/g3journal/jkag187}
}
FAQ
Using this paper in a discovery workflow
How do I find related work for this paper?
Use the related papers and topic links on this page as starting points. In Scollr, you can also open the paper and build a literature map around its references, citing papers, and related work.
How can I keep up with new Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock research papers?
Follow Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock research in Scollr. New papers from the topic flow into a personalized feed, and you can save useful studies to revisit later.
Can I cite this paper from this page?
This page includes a static BibTeX block for Using Deep Learning Models as a Genetic Architecture for the Simulation of Breeding Schemes. Always verify the DOI, source, and publication details against the publisher record before submitting a manuscript.
Follow this research in Scollr
Follow the topics and authors behind this paper, save useful studies, and build a literature map when you are ready to go deeper.
Get the app