Scollr summary
What this paper is about
Although performance differences persist for a subset of widening-participation candidates named here as mature non-graduates, they still progress through training, obtain Certificates of Completion of Training, and contribute to the medical workforce.
Full abstract
Read the full abstract
BACKGROUND: Widening participation in medicine is a key societal priority. To improve representation of non-traditional applicants, UK medical schools use contextual admissions, although definitions of under-represented groups vary across institutions. This study examined the educational and training trajectories of one such group-mature non-graduates. We aimed to determine whether their progression was comparable to that of school-leavers and graduate entrants, whether they progressed through medical school non-inferiorly, and whether they were equally likely to secure postgraduate training posts. METHODS: Data on UK medical students and resident doctors (2007-2015) were extracted from the UK Medical Education Database (UKMED). Undergraduate performance (Educational Performance Measure (EPM), Prescribing Safety Assessment (PSA), Foundation Programme Situational Judgement Test (FP-SJT) and postgraduate performance (Membership of the Royal College of Physicians, MRCP and MRCGP Applied Knowledge Test, MRCGP AKT), Annual Review of Competency Progression (ARCP), and obtaining an offer for a Level 1 training post) were compared across the three groups using multivariate statistical analyses, including Kruskal-Wallis tests where appropriate. RESULTS: Across all measures of undergraduate academic attainment (EPM, PSA and FP-SJT) and postgraduate examination performance (MRCP Part 1, Part 2 and PACES), mature non-graduates performed less well than school-leavers or graduates. They were more frequently released from training (ARCP Outcome 4) and received higher numbers of Developmental ARCP outcomes. Mature non-graduates were also less likely to receive an offer for competitive specialty training on their first application; however, the likelihood of them applying exclusively to General Practice did not differ from that of school-leavers or graduates. CONCLUSIONS: Although performance differences persist for a subset of widening-participation candidates named here as mature non-graduates, they still progress through training, obtain Certificates of Completion of Training, and contribute to the medical workforce. Further research is needed to examine how their life experience and non-traditional educational trajectories influence their long-term practice.
Direct answer
What can I do from this paper page?
Use this page to scan "How do mature non-graduate students compare to the rest of the cohort in medical training? A UKMED study" quickly: start with the summary and abstract, then check the authors, source, topics, and related papers. From here, open Scollr to follow Medical Education and Admissions research, save the paper, or map adjacent work.
Research areas
Follow related topics
Citation
BibTeX
@article{Sartania2026mature,
title = {How do mature non-graduate students compare to the rest of the cohort in medical training? A UKMED study},
author = {Nana Sartania and A.J. Troughton and Philip Chan},
journal = {BMC Medical Education},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.1186/s12909-026-09776-6},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-09776-6}
}
FAQ
Using this paper in a discovery workflow
How do I find related work for this paper?
Use the related papers and topic links on this page as starting points. In Scollr, you can also open the paper and build a literature map around its references, citing papers, and related work.
How can I keep up with new Medical Education and Admissions research papers?
Follow Medical Education and Admissions research in Scollr. New papers from the topic flow into a personalized feed, and you can save useful studies to revisit later.
Can I cite this paper from this page?
This page includes a static BibTeX block for How do mature non-graduate students compare to the rest of the cohort in medical training? A UKMED study. Always verify the DOI, source, and publication details against the publisher record before submitting a manuscript.
Follow this research in Scollr
Follow the topics and authors behind this paper, save useful studies, and build a literature map when you are ready to go deeper.
Get the app