Scollr summary
What this paper is about
Level II evidence is provided that a higher stimulation frequency of 185 Hz does not offer additional benefit in deep brain stimulation for tremor and supports 130 Hz as the standard stimulation frequency for tremor suppression in ET and PD.
Full abstract
Read the full abstract
Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral intermediate nucleus and posterior subthalamic area (VIM/PSA) in Essential Tremor (ET) and the subthalamic nucleus (STN) in Parkinson's disease (PD) are established treatment for tremor. To achieve maximum tremor control, increasing stimulation frequency beyond 130 Hz is part of clinical practice, but lacks scientific evidence. Objective: To compare tremor suppression under total electrical energy delivered (TEED)-equivalent stimulation at 130 Hz versus 185 Hz in STN-DBS for PD and VIM/PSA-DBS for ET. Methods: In this prospective, double-blind study, acute DBS effects were assessed in 18 people with ET (n = 29 hemispheres), and 25 people with PD (n = 30 hemispheres). Tremor-suppressive effects, evaluated by accelerometry, were compared with TEED-equivalent stimulation at 130 Hz and 185 Hz using linear mixed-effects models, explorative pairwise comparisons, and equivalency testing. Results: Linear mixed-effects models revealed no significant effect of stimulation frequency on tremor improvement in both cohorts. Pairwise comparisons showed no consistent differences in total tremor improvement with TEED-equivalent 185 Hz vs 130 Hz DBS. Post-hoc equivalence testing confirmed equivalence of stimulation frequencies under TEED-equivalent conditions within a +/- 20% margin of relative tremor improvement. Conclusion: This study provides Level II evidence that a higher stimulation frequency of 185 Hz does not offer additional benefit in deep brain stimulation for tremor and supports 130 Hz as the standard stimulation frequency for tremor suppression in ET and PD.
Direct answer
What can I do from this paper page?
Use this page to scan "No Additional Benefit of 185 Hz versus 130 Hz at Equivalent Energy in Deep Brain Stimulation for Tremor - A Prospective Clinical Trial" quickly: start with the summary and abstract, then check the authors, source, topics, and related papers. From here, open Scollr to follow Neurological disorders and treatments research, save the paper, or map adjacent work.
Research areas
Follow related topics
Citation
BibTeX
@article{Linden2026Additional,
title = {No Additional Benefit of 185 Hz versus 130 Hz at Equivalent Energy in Deep Brain Stimulation for Tremor - A Prospective Clinical Trial},
author = {Christina van der Linden and Peer Trapp and Till A Dembek and Charlotte Schedlich-Teufer and Gregor A Brandt and Hannah Jergas and Gereon R Fink and Veerle Visser-Vandewalle and Michael T Barbe and Jan Niklas Petry-Schmelzer},
journal = {medRxiv},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.64898/2026.05.31.26354199},
url = {https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.31.26354199}
}
FAQ
Using this paper in a discovery workflow
How do I find related work for this paper?
Use the related papers and topic links on this page as starting points. In Scollr, you can also open the paper and build a literature map around its references, citing papers, and related work.
How can I keep up with new Neurological disorders and treatments research papers?
Follow Neurological disorders and treatments research in Scollr. New papers from the topic flow into a personalized feed, and you can save useful studies to revisit later.
Can I cite this paper from this page?
This page includes a static BibTeX block for No Additional Benefit of 185 Hz versus 130 Hz at Equivalent Energy in Deep Brain Stimulation for Tremor - A Prospective Clinical Trial. Always verify the DOI, source, and publication details against the publisher record before submitting a manuscript.
Follow this research in Scollr
Follow the topics and authors behind this paper, save useful studies, and build a literature map when you are ready to go deeper.
Get the app