Freedom of Expression and Defamation
Open access
Peer reviewed
Abstract
Abstract
Digital defamation has become a serious threat to reputation in Nigeria because false statements now spread faster than traditional legal and institutional responses. Through platforms such as Facebook, X, TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, blogs, and WhatsApp groups, fake allegations can quickly damage a person’s dignity, employment prospects, business reputation, political standing, family relationships, and social acceptance. This article adopted the doctrinal research methodology. It relied on primary legal sources, including the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999, the Cybercrimes Act 2015 as amended, the Nigeria Data Protection Act 2023, Nigerian case laws, and relevant international human rights instruments. It also used secondary sources such as textbooks, journal articles, commentaries, reports, and online legal materials. The method of analysis is descriptive, analytical, and comparative, with references to selected foreign approaches. The article examined digital defamation and reputation damage in Nigeria, with emphasis on fake allegations, viral content, cancel culture, legal remedies, ethical duties, and enforcement challenges. The article argued that Nigeria needs a balanced legal response. The paper recommended that victims of false and malicious online allegations should have access to timely remedies, including damages, injunctions, takedown orders, apologies, corrections, preservation of digital evidence, and de-indexing where appropriate. At the same time, it recommended that, the law must protect lawful criticism, investigative journalism, whistleblowing, public complaints, activism, and public-interest speech. It concluded with the suggestion that digital defamation in Nigeria requires faster court procedures, responsible platform governance, improved digital evidence capacity, ethical media practice, and public education on the legal risks of sharing unverified allegations.
Direct answer
What can I do from this paper page?
Use this page to scan "Digital Defamation and Reputation Damage in the Age of Viral Content: Legal and Ethical Implications" quickly: start with the summary and abstract, then check the authors, source, topics, and related papers. From here, open Scollr to follow Freedom of Expression and Defamation research, save the paper, or map adjacent work.
Research areas
Follow related topics
Citation
BibTeX
@article{Bribena2026Digital,
title = {Digital Defamation and Reputation Damage in the Age of Viral Content: Legal and Ethical Implications},
author = {Kelvin Bribena},
journal = {JOURNAL OF LAW AND GLOBAL POLICY},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.56201/jlgp.vol.11.no2.2026.pg162.176},
url = {https://doi.org/10.56201/jlgp.vol.11.no2.2026.pg162.176}
}FAQ
Using this paper in a discovery workflow
How do I find related work for this paper?
Use the related papers and topic links on this page as starting points. In Scollr, you can also open the paper and build a literature map around its references, citing papers, and related work.
How can I keep up with new Freedom of Expression and Defamation research papers?
Follow Freedom of Expression and Defamation research in Scollr. New papers from the topic flow into a personalized feed, and you can save useful studies to revisit later.
Can I cite this paper from this page?
This page includes a static BibTeX block for Digital Defamation and Reputation Damage in the Age of Viral Content: Legal and Ethical Implications. Always verify the DOI, source, and publication details against the publisher record before submitting a manuscript.
Follow this research in Scollr
Follow the topics and authors behind this paper, save useful studies, and build a literature map when you are ready to go deeper.
Get the app