Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Open access
Peer reviewed
Abstract
Abstract
Objective To validate the reliability of Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring (CACS) by using virtual non-contrast (VNC) images reconstructed from contrast-enhanced photon-counting coronary CT angiography (CCTA) versus true non-contrast (TNC) images, and to assess the impact on plaque burden classification. Materials and methods 239 patients who underwent contrast-enhanced photon-counting CCTA with TNC imaging were included. Agatston score was calculated on both (VNC and TNC) datasets. Scores ≤ 0.9 were rounded to 0. Patients were divided into plaque groups according to the CAD-RADS 2.0 classification system. Borderline cases (P0 vs. P1) were reassessed by two radiologists with blinded adjudication. Results Median Agatston scores showed no significant difference (TNC: 14.2 [range: 0.0–2951.2] vs. VNC: 8.0 [range: 0.0–3069.3]; p = 0.54). Correlation was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.97 [95% CI: 0.97, 0.98]. Robust linear regression revealed a significant relationship (intercept = 3.27 [95% CI: 1.28, 5.87]; slope=0.97 [95% CI: 0.97, 0.98]; p < 0.001). Despite the excellent correlation, a significant difference in plaque classification was observed ( p = 0.005). Classification was consistent in 160/239 (67%; κ = 0.88) patients. After a consensus reading, the agreement improved to 205/239 patients (86%; κ = 0.95). Conclusion Agatston scores derived from TNC and VNC images show no significant differences and excellent consistency. However, the agreement for plaque classification is limited, preventing VNC images from directly substituting for TNC images for this purpose. While a subjective reading significantly improved agreement, further research is required before clinical implementation.
Direct answer
What can I do from this paper page?
Use this page to scan "Coronary artery calcium scoring using virtual vs. true non-contrast images from ultra-high-resolution and normal-resolution photon-counting coronary CT angiography" quickly: start with the summary and abstract, then check the authors, source, topics, and related papers. From here, open Scollr to follow Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics research, save the paper, or map adjacent work.
Research areas
Follow related topics
Citation
BibTeX
@article{Engel2026Coronary,
title = {Coronary artery calcium scoring using virtual vs. true non-contrast images from ultra-high-resolution and normal-resolution photon-counting coronary CT angiography},
author = {Sophia Engel and Iram Shahzadi and Nina Pauline Haag and Roman Johannes Gertz and Julius Henning Niehoff and Alexey Surov and Jan Borggrefe and Jan Robert Kroeger},
journal = {European Journal of Radiology Open},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.1016/j.ejro.2026.100795},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2026.100795}
}FAQ
Using this paper in a discovery workflow
How do I find related work for this paper?
Use the related papers and topic links on this page as starting points. In Scollr, you can also open the paper and build a literature map around its references, citing papers, and related work.
How can I keep up with new Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics research papers?
Follow Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics research in Scollr. New papers from the topic flow into a personalized feed, and you can save useful studies to revisit later.
Can I cite this paper from this page?
This page includes a static BibTeX block for Coronary artery calcium scoring using virtual vs. true non-contrast images from ultra-high-resolution and normal-resolution photon-counting coronary CT angiography. Always verify the DOI, source, and publication details against the publisher record before submitting a manuscript.
Follow this research in Scollr
Follow the topics and authors behind this paper, save useful studies, and build a literature map when you are ready to go deeper.
Get the app