Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes Open access Peer reviewed

External validation and comparison of five prediction models for lymph node metastasis after noncurative endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer

Hiroto Noda, Souya Nunobe, João Santos‐Antunes, Hiroshi Kawachi and 5 more

Gastric Cancer | Sep 7, 2026

Scollr summary

What this paper is about

Three-risk classifications of the eCura system and W-eCura score, when appropriately calibrated, may support decision-making regarding additional gastrectomy in patients with noncurative ESD in this Japanese cohort.

Full abstract

Read the full abstract

BACKGROUND: Additional gastrectomy is recommended after noncurative endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC) despite the low incidence of lymph node metastasis (LNM). The eCura system, W-eCura score, and 11-point score reportedly predict LNM risk; however, their comparative performance remains unclear. We aimed to externally validate and directly compare five risk stratification approaches in patients with noncurative ESD. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 634 consecutive patients with EGC who underwent noncurative ESD at a single high-volume center. Five prediction models were evaluated: the eCura system (7-point score and three-risk classification), W-eCura score (7-point score and three-risk classification), and 11-point score. All pathological findings were re-evaluated by an outcome-blinded expert pathologist. Model performance was assessed by discrimination, calibration, and decision-curve analysis (DCA). RESULTS: LNM was identified in 26 (4.9%) patients. All models showed comparable discrimination (c-statistics, 0.71 to 0.72). However, calibration-in-the-large and calibration slope were poorer in the W-eCura score and 11-point score (- 1.43 to - 0.96 and 0.26 to 0.64) than in the eCura system (- 0.43 to - 0.40 and 0.83 to 0.84). Using DCA, the eCura system and W-eCura score consistently showed higher net benefits than did the 11-point score across clinically relevant threshold probabilities. Recalibration improved both calibration and net benefits across all models. CONCLUSIONS: Despite similar discriminative performance, the eCura system demonstrated relatively favorable calibration and potential clinical utility in this Japanese cohort. Given their simplicity and structural similarity, three-risk classifications of the eCura system and W-eCura score, when appropriately calibrated, may support decision-making regarding additional gastrectomy.

Direct answer

What can I do from this paper page?

Use this page to scan "External validation and comparison of five prediction models for lymph node metastasis after noncurative endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer" quickly: start with the summary and abstract, then check the authors, source, topics, and related papers. From here, open Scollr to follow Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes research, save the paper, or map adjacent work.

Authors

Researchers on this paper

Hiroto Noda

middle | Nippon Medical School Hospital | ORCID 0000-0003-1180-7128

Souya Nunobe

middle | Japanese Foundation For Cancer Research

João Santos‐Antunes

middle | Hospital de São João | ORCID 0000-0003-0614-0576

Hiroshi Kawachi

last | Japanese Foundation For Cancer Research | ORCID 0000-0002-8270-791X

Ayaka Takasu

first | Nihon University | ORCID 0000-0003-0130-7170

Waku Hatta

middle | Tohoku University | ORCID 0000-0001-9717-0281

Takuji Gotoda

middle | Nihon University | ORCID 0000-0001-6904-6777

Yohei Ogata

middle | Tohoku University | ORCID 0000-0002-5762-2156

Yuichiro Kemmoto

middle | Japanese Foundation For Cancer Research | ORCID 0009-0001-1073-795X

Research areas

Follow related topics

Citation

BibTeX

@article{Noda2026External,
  title = {External validation and comparison of five prediction models for lymph node metastasis after noncurative endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer},
  author = {Hiroto Noda and Souya Nunobe and João Santos‐Antunes and Hiroshi Kawachi and Ayaka Takasu and Waku Hatta and Takuji Gotoda and Yohei Ogata and Yuichiro Kemmoto},
  journal = {Gastric Cancer},
  year = {2026},
  doi = {10.1007/s10120-026-01798-9},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-026-01798-9}
}

FAQ

Using this paper in a discovery workflow

How do I find related work for this paper?

Use the related papers and topic links on this page as starting points. In Scollr, you can also open the paper and build a literature map around its references, citing papers, and related work.

How can I keep up with new Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes research papers?

Follow Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes research in Scollr. New papers from the topic flow into a personalized feed, and you can save useful studies to revisit later.

Can I cite this paper from this page?

This page includes a static BibTeX block for External validation and comparison of five prediction models for lymph node metastasis after noncurative endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer. Always verify the DOI, source, and publication details against the publisher record before submitting a manuscript.

Follow this research in Scollr

Follow the topics and authors behind this paper, save useful studies, and build a literature map when you are ready to go deeper.

Get the app