Scollr summary
What this paper is about
This review critically summarizes the preclinical evidence supplied for Azadirachta indica (neem) and Garcinia indica (kokum), with emphasis on glycaemic control, insulin-related pathways, oxidative stress, lipid abnormalities and organ-protective outcomes.
Full abstract
Read the full abstract
Diabetes mellitus is a chronic metabolic disorder characterized by persistent hyperglycaemia arising from impaired insulin secretion, insulin action, or both. Plant-derived products are investigated as possible sources of complementary antidiabetic agents because they contain chemically diverse constituents that may influence glucose regulation and diabetes-associated tissue injury. This review critically summarizes the preclinical evidence supplied for Azadirachta indica (neem) and Garcinia indica (kokum), with emphasis on glycaemic control, insulin-related pathways, oxidative stress, lipid abnormalities and organ-protective outcomes. Neem studies in chemically induced and diet-associated diabetic rodents report reductions in blood glucose, improvements in lipid indices, restoration of antioxidant enzymes and changes in insulin-signalling proteins. However, one neonatal streptozotocin model found that a 0.8% neem leaf preparation improved beta-cell morphology but did not restore glucose homeostasis, illustrating that outcomes depend on the model and preparation. Kokum studies report that aqueous fruit extract lowered fasting and postprandial glucose and restored erythrocyte glutathione in diabetic rats; other studies found glucose-, lipid- and renal-profile improvements with fruit-rind extracts, while a seed methanolic extract also reduced glucose in streptozotocin-treated rats. These findings are promising but remain preclinical. Differences in plant part, extraction solvent, dose, duration and diabetes model limit direct comparison. The evidence base lacks adequate standardization, pharmacokinetic characterization, long-term toxicology and controlled human efficacy data. Neither plant should be considered a proven substitute for established diabetes treatment. Further work should prioritize authenticated and chemically standardized extracts, reproducible dose-response studies, mechanistic validation, safety assessment and carefully designed clinical trials
Direct answer
What can I do from this paper page?
Use this page to scan "A Review of Preclinical Evidence and Translational Gaps" quickly: start with the summary and abstract, then check the authors, source, topics, and related papers. From here, open Scollr to follow Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies research, save the paper, or map adjacent work.
Research areas
Follow related topics
Citation
BibTeX
@article{R2026Review,
title = {A Review of Preclinical Evidence and Translational Gaps},
author = {Miss. Gunjal Priyanka B and Mr. Bhane Aniket R and Mrs. Puja Khemnar K},
journal = {International Journal of Advanced Research in Science Communication and Technology},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.48175/ijarsct-40542},
url = {https://doi.org/10.48175/ijarsct-40542}
}
FAQ
Using this paper in a discovery workflow
How do I find related work for this paper?
Use the related papers and topic links on this page as starting points. In Scollr, you can also open the paper and build a literature map around its references, citing papers, and related work.
How can I keep up with new Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies research papers?
Follow Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies research in Scollr. New papers from the topic flow into a personalized feed, and you can save useful studies to revisit later.
Can I cite this paper from this page?
This page includes a static BibTeX block for A Review of Preclinical Evidence and Translational Gaps. Always verify the DOI, source, and publication details against the publisher record before submitting a manuscript.
Follow this research in Scollr
Follow the topics and authors behind this paper, save useful studies, and build a literature map when you are ready to go deeper.
Get the app