Abstract
Abstract
University websites are essential platforms for disseminating information and facilitating online education. While existing research has identified accessibility gaps in Oceania’s higher education institutions, there remains a limited understanding of persistent barriers and insufficient continuous evaluation practices. This study addresses these gaps by conducting a two-phase accessibility evaluation (2022–2024) of 42 Australian university websites, employing a multi-method approach integrating automated tools and manual auditing. The findings reveal some improvement, primarily due to a reduction in the number of accessibility errors detected across university websites. However, common issues persist, including missing alternative text, inconsistent heading structures, unclear link and button labels, and elements that are not compatible with screen readers or other assistive technologies. Notably, critical accessibility issues that cannot be reliably detected by automated tools, such as focus visibility, inadequate colour contrast, and poor keyboard navigability, also persist. This study argues that ongoing web inaccessibility may exacerbate educational inequality. Additionally, we examine reasons behind the persistence of specific accessibility barriers and highlight the limitations of solely automated evaluations, illustrating why a hybrid evaluation approach is essential. Acknowledging limitations such as the time-bound nature of the evaluation, this study provides practical recommendations for administrators, developers, and policymakers, offering a robust framework for continuous and comprehensive accessibility assessment. While grounded in the Australian university context, these insights have global relevance for improving web accessibility in higher education institutions worldwide.
Direct answer
What can I do from this paper page?
Use this page to scan "Accessible for all? A longitudinal evaluation of the digital accessibility of all Australian university websites" quickly: start with the summary and abstract, then check the authors, source, topics, and related papers. From here, open Scollr to follow Digital Accessibility for Disabilities research, save the paper, or map adjacent work.
Research areas
Follow related topics
Citation
BibTeX
@article{Badiuzzaman2026Accessible,
title = {Accessible for all? A longitudinal evaluation of the digital accessibility of all Australian university websites},
author = {Md Badiuzzaman and Zixi Jiang and Jung‐Sook Lee and Therese M. Cumming},
journal = {Humanities and Social Sciences Communications},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.1057/s41599-026-07283-z},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-07283-z}
}
FAQ
Using this paper in a discovery workflow
How do I find related work for this paper?
Use the related papers and topic links on this page as starting points. In Scollr, you can also open the paper and build a literature map around its references, citing papers, and related work.
How can I keep up with new Digital Accessibility for Disabilities research papers?
Follow Digital Accessibility for Disabilities research in Scollr. New papers from the topic flow into a personalized feed, and you can save useful studies to revisit later.
Can I cite this paper from this page?
This page includes a static BibTeX block for Accessible for all? A longitudinal evaluation of the digital accessibility of all Australian university websites. Always verify the DOI, source, and publication details against the publisher record before submitting a manuscript.
Follow this research in Scollr
Follow the topics and authors behind this paper, save useful studies, and build a literature map when you are ready to go deeper.
Get the app