Abstract
Abstract
Careless responding is a concern in online surveys and poses a threat to data quality in intensive longitudinal research, which often relies on repeated online surveys. Despite its potential impact, little research has examined careless responding in adolescent daily diary research. This study investigated the prevalence, trends, and baseline correlates of careless responding using two daily attention check (ACQ) questions and response time data in a 21-day daily diary study of 311 youths aged 12 to 16. Average compliance (75.1%) and careless responding rates (3.4% to 18.1%) were comparable to those reported in recent meta-analyses with adult samples, supporting the feasibility of collecting 21-day daily diaries from adolescents. Response time screening using the common 2-second-per-item rule was less sensitive than ACQs in detecting careless responding in adolescent daily diaries. Participants failed the second ACQ more frequently than the first, highlighting both the value of multiple ACQs per assessment and the potential benefit of shorter surveys. Younger adolescents and those with higher state anger, more neighborhood problems, lower anger control, and poorer emotion regulation were more likely to fail ACQs. Sensitivity analyses using various subsamples after removing careless responding cases suggested that longitudinal analysis results may be inflated when careless responding is not addressed. Our findings underscore the importance of incorporating attention check and response time measures and conducting sensitivity analyses to examine the robustness of statistical conclusions in intensive longitudinal research with youth.
Direct answer
What can I do from this paper page?
Use this page to scan "Careless Responding in Daily Diary Research: Detection and Impact on Intensive Longitudinal Data Analyses" quickly: start with the summary and abstract, then check the authors, source, topics, and related papers. From here, open Scollr to follow Survey Methodology and Nonresponse research, save the paper, or map adjacent work.
Research areas
Follow related topics
Citation
BibTeX
@article{Wang2026Careless,
title = {Careless Responding in Daily Diary Research: Detection and Impact on Intensive Longitudinal Data Analyses},
author = {Lijuan Wang and Tiffany Yip and Yuan Fang and R. Li and Kyle Lorenzo and Irene J. K. Park and Kristin Valentino and Mario Cruz‐Gonzalez and Jenny Zhen‐Duan and Kiara Álvarez and Patrick Shrout and Margarita Alegría},
journal = {Journal of Behavioral Data Science},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.35566/jbds/wang2026},
url = {https://doi.org/10.35566/jbds/wang2026}
}
FAQ
Using this paper in a discovery workflow
How do I find related work for this paper?
Use the related papers and topic links on this page as starting points. In Scollr, you can also open the paper and build a literature map around its references, citing papers, and related work.
How can I keep up with new Survey Methodology and Nonresponse research papers?
Follow Survey Methodology and Nonresponse research in Scollr. New papers from the topic flow into a personalized feed, and you can save useful studies to revisit later.
Can I cite this paper from this page?
This page includes a static BibTeX block for Careless Responding in Daily Diary Research: Detection and Impact on Intensive Longitudinal Data Analyses. Always verify the DOI, source, and publication details against the publisher record before submitting a manuscript.
Follow this research in Scollr
Follow the topics and authors behind this paper, save useful studies, and build a literature map when you are ready to go deeper.
Get the app