Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
Open access
Peer reviewed
Abstract
Abstract
In this paper, we define the notion of genuinely non-traditional logics , and show that FDE is an easy example of such logics. Since some might find the (definable) arrow in FDE unsuitable to play the role of an implication, even for a non-reflexive logic, we consider some expansions of FDE with connectives satisfying more properties usually expected from implications.
Direct answer
What can I do from this paper page?
Use this page to scan "Genuinely Non-traditional Logics" quickly: start with the summary and abstract, then check the authors, source, topics, and related papers. From here, open Scollr to follow Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge research, save the paper, or map adjacent work.
Research areas
Follow related topics
Citation
BibTeX
@article{Cuenca2026Genuinely,
title = {Genuinely Non-traditional Logics},
author = {Sandra D. Cuenca and Luis Estrada-Gonzalez},
journal = {Logica Universalis},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.1007/s11787-026-00426-5},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-026-00426-5}
}FAQ
Using this paper in a discovery workflow
How do I find related work for this paper?
Use the related papers and topic links on this page as starting points. In Scollr, you can also open the paper and build a literature map around its references, citing papers, and related work.
How can I keep up with new Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge research papers?
Follow Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge research in Scollr. New papers from the topic flow into a personalized feed, and you can save useful studies to revisit later.
Can I cite this paper from this page?
This page includes a static BibTeX block for Genuinely Non-traditional Logics. Always verify the DOI, source, and publication details against the publisher record before submitting a manuscript.
Follow this research in Scollr
Follow the topics and authors behind this paper, save useful studies, and build a literature map when you are ready to go deeper.
Get the app