From Flood Hazard to Bridge Decisions Under Uncertainty: A Critical Review of the Scour Monitoring–Prediction–Decision Chain

Abstract

Abstract

Flood-induced scour remains one of the leading causes of bridge failure, yet the chain linking flood hazard to bridge decisions is still commonly treated as a sequence of disconnected tasks. This review examines that chain using uncertainty as a unifying interpretive framework, synthesizing the recent literature on non-stationary flood hazard assessment, bridge-scale hydraulics, scour processes and predictive models, scour monitoring, monitoring-informed forecasting, structural vulnerability, and risk-informed decision-making. The review synthesizes the state of the art across all these stages of the chain, highlighting how the dominant uncertainty changes along it: climate and hydrologic variability upstream; model-form, sediment, and parameter uncertainty in scour prediction; measurement noise and inverse-inference uncertainty in monitoring; and threshold and consequence uncertainty in closure, retrofit, and network-level decisions. Although major advances have been achieved in probabilistic modelling, machine learning, hybrid physics-informed methods, and multimodal sensing, most published frameworks still transfer deterministic outputs from one stage to the next. As a result, uncertainty is rarely propagated consistently to the decision level. The main value of this review lies in making the chain’s weak interfaces explicit, in showing how uncertainty propagation can serve as a unifying framework across otherwise disconnected literatures, and in identifying which methodological directions are most promising for connecting prediction, monitoring, and decision support into a coherent end-to-end probabilistic chain supporting climate-resilient bridge management.