Populism, Right-Wing Movements Open access Peer reviewed

Affective polarization and the support for populist and technocratic governance

Sarah Engler, Ivo Bantel, Lucas Leemann

Party Politics | Jun 30, 2026

Abstract

Abstract

How do citizens differ in their view of democratic governance when they are more affectively polarised? This study examines how the support for different forms of governance in Germany – focusing on populist governance, and technocratic governance – vary at different levels of affective polarization. We argue that heightened affective polarization is linked to support for less pluralist forms of governance. Populist voters, especially from radical right parties, tend to favor direct democracy, which aligns with their majoritarian beliefs, while non-populist voters with high affective polarization favor technocratic governance. Using observational survey data from Germany, we illustrate how preferences for different forms of governance vary at different levels of affective polarization and how this relationship is conditioned by partisan identity. These findings contribute to understanding how political divisions reshape democratic attitudes in multiparty systems.

Direct answer

What can I do from this paper page?

Use this page to scan "Affective polarization and the support for populist and technocratic governance" quickly: start with the summary and abstract, then check the authors, source, topics, and related papers. From here, open Scollr to follow Populism, Right-Wing Movements research, save the paper, or map adjacent work.

Authors

Researchers on this paper

Sarah Engler

first | Leuphana University of Lüneburg | ORCID 0000-0003-3555-1091

Ivo Bantel

middle | University of Zurich | ORCID 0000-0002-3664-5826

Lucas Leemann

last | University of Zurich | ORCID 0000-0001-5201-869X

Research areas

Follow related topics

Citation

BibTeX

@article{Engler2026Affective,
  title = {Affective polarization and the support for populist and technocratic governance},
  author = {Sarah Engler and Ivo Bantel and Lucas Leemann},
  journal = {Party Politics},
  year = {2026},
  doi = {10.1177/13540688261461499},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688261461499}
}

FAQ

Using this paper in a discovery workflow

How do I find related work for this paper?

Use the related papers and topic links on this page as starting points. In Scollr, you can also open the paper and build a literature map around its references, citing papers, and related work.

How can I keep up with new Populism, Right-Wing Movements research papers?

Follow Populism, Right-Wing Movements research in Scollr. New papers from the topic flow into a personalized feed, and you can save useful studies to revisit later.

Can I cite this paper from this page?

This page includes a static BibTeX block for Affective polarization and the support for populist and technocratic governance. Always verify the DOI, source, and publication details against the publisher record before submitting a manuscript.

Follow this research in Scollr

Follow the topics and authors behind this paper, save useful studies, and build a literature map when you are ready to go deeper.

Get the app