Scollr
Weekly Trend BriefEvidence window ending 2026-05-10

AI in cancer detection

Weekly trend brief

AI cancer-detection papers are concentrated in mammography, pathology slides, and deployment barriers. The current 30-day evidence window contains 636 eligible papers, 4.2x the prior 30-day window, with 633 abstract-backed papers available for a closer scan. Representative papers point to mammographic self-supervision, pathology foundation models, whole-slide metastasis detection, cytology classification, interpretable histopathology models, pathologist-AI interaction, and clinical implementation barriers.

636Recent papers
4.2xVs prior window
633Abstract-backed
6Representative sources
Current windowRecent eligible papers
ComparisonPrior eligible papers
Brief typeWeekly research trend
Evidence-backed signals

What's moving

1
Signal

The recent window is materially active

636 eligible papers appear in the current 30-day evidence window, compared with 153 in the prior 30 days. The busiest visible day is 2026-04-21 with 69 eligible papers.

4.2x prior-window volume
2
Signal

The reviewable evidence is broad enough for commentary

633 recent papers include abstracts, about 100% of the eligible set. That gives the brief enough signal for topic-specific commentary while keeping claims limited to paper metadata and representative titles.

633 abstract-backed papers
3
Signal

Representative titles show a clear topic shape

The selected papers point toward mammographic self-supervision, pathology foundation models, whole-slide metastasis detection, cytology classification, interpretable histopathology models, pathologist-AI interaction, and clinical implementation barriers. That gives the brief a visible research direction rather than only a ranked list of recent papers.

8 representative papers
4
Signal

Source mix gives readers multiple entry points

8 representative papers span 6 sources, including 2 preprints that should be treated as preliminary.

6 representative sources
Topic shape

Theme clusters

Breast imaging and mammography models

Mammography and breast-cancer survival papers show the current evidence set is not just generic imaging AI.

8 representative papers

Pathology and slide-level classification

Whole-slide, cytology, histopathology, and foundation-model papers make digital pathology a central thread.

8 representative papers

Human workflow and deployment

Pathologist-AI interaction and implementation-barrier papers keep clinical workflow questions next to model-performance work.

8 representative papers
Evidence anchors

Representative papers

AI in cancer detectionarticle

MammoDINO: Anatomically Aware Self-Supervision for Mammographic Images

Selected because it anchors a mammography, pathology, explainability, pathologist-workflow, or clinical-deployment question; this paper appears in arXiv (Cornell University) (2026) and is matched to AI in cancer detection.

arXiv (Cornell University) · 2026
AI in cancer detectionpreprint

Benchmarking Pathology Foundation Models for Breast Cancer Survival Prediction

Selected because it anchors a mammography, pathology, explainability, pathologist-workflow, or clinical-deployment question; this paper appears in arXiv (Cornell University) (2026) and is matched to AI in cancer detection. Treat as preliminary because it is marked as a preprint.

arXiv (Cornell University) · 2026
AI in cancer detectionarticle

Examination of Pathologist–Artificial Intelligence Interactions and Their Impact on Pathologist Accuracy Using Artificial Intelligence–Assisted Scoring of Immunohistochemistry for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2

Selected because it anchors a mammography, pathology, explainability, pathologist-workflow, or clinical-deployment question; this paper appears in Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine (2026) and is matched to AI in cancer detection.

Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine · 2026