The recent window is materially active
732 eligible papers appear in the current 30-day evidence window, compared with 149 in the prior 30 days. The busiest visible day is 2026-04-24 with 44 eligible papers.
4.9x prior-window volumeWeekly trend brief
Sepsis papers are focused on early warning, risk stratification, and care-timing signals. The current 30-day evidence window contains 732 eligible papers, 4.9x the prior 30-day window, with 725 abstract-backed papers available for a closer scan. Representative papers point to lactate-integrated warning scores, pediatric risk stratification, machine-learning subtyping, prehospital prediction, ICU mortality predictors, timely detection, SOFA comparisons, and procalcitonin.
732 eligible papers appear in the current 30-day evidence window, compared with 149 in the prior 30 days. The busiest visible day is 2026-04-24 with 44 eligible papers.
4.9x prior-window volume725 recent papers include abstracts, about 99% of the eligible set. That gives the brief enough signal for topic-specific commentary while keeping claims limited to paper metadata and representative titles.
725 abstract-backed papersThe selected papers point toward lactate-integrated warning scores, pediatric risk stratification, machine-learning subtyping, prehospital prediction, ICU mortality predictors, timely detection, SOFA comparisons, and procalcitonin. That gives the brief a visible research direction rather than only a ranked list of recent papers.
8 representative papers8 representative papers span 8 sources.
8 representative sourcesLactate scores, prehospital prediction, and timely-care papers point to front-door detection and escalation decisions.
8 representative papersPediatric, ICU, resource-limited, and multicenter cohorts show the evidence set spans different clinical contexts.
8 representative papersSOFA variants, PELOD-2, procalcitonin, and ML subtyping frame the current methods conversation.
8 representative papersSelected because it anchors an early-warning, risk-stratification, biomarker, clinical-score, or ML-subtyping question; this paper appears in Bratislavské lekárske listy/Bratislava medical journal (2026) and is matched to Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment.
Selected because it anchors an early-warning, risk-stratification, biomarker, clinical-score, or ML-subtyping question; this paper appears in Acute and Critical Care (2026) and is matched to Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment.
Selected because it anchors an early-warning, risk-stratification, biomarker, clinical-score, or ML-subtyping question; this paper appears in BMC Infectious Diseases (2026) and is matched to Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment.
Selected because it anchors an early-warning, risk-stratification, biomarker, clinical-score, or ML-subtyping question; this paper appears in Emergency Medicine Journal (2026) and is matched to Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment.
Selected because it anchors an early-warning, risk-stratification, biomarker, clinical-score, or ML-subtyping question; this paper appears in Journal of Anesthesia Analgesia and Critical Care (2026) and is matched to Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment.
Selected because it anchors an early-warning, risk-stratification, biomarker, clinical-score, or ML-subtyping question; this paper appears in Digital Showcase Research, Scholarship, & Creative Works (University of Lynchburg) (2026) and is matched to Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment.
Selected because it anchors an early-warning, risk-stratification, biomarker, clinical-score, or ML-subtyping question; this paper appears in SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (2026) and is matched to Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment.
Selected because it anchors an early-warning, risk-stratification, biomarker, clinical-score, or ML-subtyping question; this paper appears in Critical Care (2026) and is matched to Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment.